tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-974773076690597683.post1906734160438544961..comments2024-03-28T16:08:29.578-04:00Comments on Sardonicky: Supremes Being Supreme: Feudalism EditionKaren Garciahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15612731479365562803noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-974773076690597683.post-48392563400745087972016-02-18T21:42:13.926-05:002016-02-18T21:42:13.926-05:00Bạn đang là người yêu thích các nhãn hiệu điện tho...Bạn đang là người yêu thích các nhãn hiệu điện thoại Trung Quốc. Bạn muốn sử dụng các loại điện thoại của Trung Quốc nhưng lại không biết phải làm thế nào. Dịch vụ <a href="javascript:void(0);" rel="nofollow">chuyên vận chuyển hàng từ trung quốc về việt nam</a> . Trung Quốc luôn được xem là thị trường nhập khẩu chính của nước ta trong nhiều năm qua đặc biệt là với các ngành như dệt mày, giày dép, <a href="http://vanchuyenhangtrungquoc.net/chuyen-nhan-van-chuyen-hang-trung-quoc-uy-tin-gia-re.html" rel="nofollow">vận chuyển hàng trung quốc uy tín</a> cùng với <a href="http://vanchuyenhangtrungquoc.net/cong-ty-van-chuyen-hang-hoa-tu-trung-quoc-ve-viet-nam-uy-tin.html" rel="nofollow">công ty vận chuyển hàng trung quốc</a> đã và đang được nhiều người tiêu dùng tại Việt Nam sử dụng và rất hài lòng <a href="http://vanchuyenhangtrungquoc.net/chuyen-nhan-van-chuyen-hang-tu-trung-quoc-di-ve-tphcm.html" rel="nofollow">vận chuyển hàng từ trung quốc về tphcm</a> được nhanh gọn và dễ dàng hơn bao giờ hết. Ngoài ra <a href="http://vanchuyenhangtrungquoc.net/chuyen-nhan-van-chuyen-hang-tu-trung-quoc-ve-ha-noi.html" rel="nofollow">chuyển hàng từ trung quốc về hà nội</a> sẽ giúp hàng hóa về với thời gian nhanh hơn khi những quý khách đang có những nhu cầu mua sắm cần thiết. Hãy liên hệ ngay với <a href="http://vanchuyenhangtrungquoc.net/chuyen-nhan-ship-hang-hoa-tu-trung-quoc-ve-viet-nam.html" rel="nofollow">nhận ship hàng từ trung quốc về việt nam</a> để có thể tha ga mua sắm.<br />Ngoài ra chúng tôi còng cung cấp dịch vụ <a href="https://www.facebook.com/MuaHangTrenAmazonShipVeVietNam" rel="nofollow">mua hàng amazon</a> với chi phí thấp, thời gian chờ hàng ngắn, uy tín, chất lượng, phục vụ chu đáo với những tiện ích của <a href="http://ordershiphangnhat.com/nhan-order-hang-tu-nhat-ban-ve-viet-nam-uy-tin-gia-re.html" rel="nofollow">order hàng nhật giá rẻ</a>. chắc chằn rằng quý khách hàng sẽ hài lòng với <a href="http://ordershiphangnhat.com/dich-vu-nhan-order-hang-do-tu-nhat-ban-ve-viet-nam.html" rel="nofollow">dịch vụ order hàng nhật</a><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08923748052472852195noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-974773076690597683.post-23755309406875288532014-07-03T11:19:16.099-04:002014-07-03T11:19:16.099-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Isaiah Earharthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04915582508162317710noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-974773076690597683.post-71103628954613299122014-07-01T15:26:29.316-04:002014-07-01T15:26:29.316-04:00Working from a tablet away from home so can't ...Working from a tablet away from home so can't comment or reply at length 'cause typing is difficult.<br /><br />But when in this nation's history has the intersection of the right to free expression of one's religion/faith with state NOT landed squarely in the center of a "minefield?"<br /><br />These are easy questions/issues to be answered by the legislative and judicial branches ONLY if they have complete contempt for the views of one side or the other, in which case it's a simple matter to completely trample the rights of one or the other, rather than balancing them.<br /><br />The "Hobby Lobby" case SHOULD have been difficult to decide, and it SHOULD be unsurprising that it was a narrow decision.<br /><br />Personally, though pro-choice I think the court made the right decision for corporations that are "closely held."<br /><br />And besides, as someone else pointed out, this just be one more nail in the coffin of ObummerCare, and a new paving stone added to the road to single-payer.Zeenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-974773076690597683.post-5253502208281103742014-07-01T08:44:58.347-04:002014-07-01T08:44:58.347-04:00Consider this. The Man is getting more and more br...Consider this. The Man is getting more and more brazen; not really caring what large majorities of the public think. And by the Man I mean the overseers and mechanics for the 1%, the people who make and enforce the rules. I can only think they've lost their fear of us - the mob.<br />Part of this is the propaganda success, beginning with Reagan, with which they've divided us. But a lot of it, I think, has to do with the fact that we've become over civilized - too bourgeois. it has become 'impolite' to fight for our rights with loud voices, flaming pens, and yes, fists if need be. We've gotten too soft, we are no longer the hoi polloi, but the Eloi, easy victims for the Morlocks.James F Traynornoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-974773076690597683.post-6104509549583021482014-07-01T01:00:49.899-04:002014-07-01T01:00:49.899-04:00We hyperbolic lefty critics of Washington keep say...We hyperbolic lefty critics of Washington keep saying there is no difference between the Democrats and the Republicans in the first and second branches of American government. <br /><br />The same can justifiably be said of the Supreme Court, which sits atop the pinnacle of the third branch and whose decisions must be followed all the way down the line of the third branch. The nine supremes deciding McCullen v Coakley today, both the women and the men, both the Democratic nominees and the Republican nominees, were UNANIMOUS in taking down that 35-foot barrier around women’s health clinics. In fact, 67% of this term’s decisions have been unanimous.<br /><br />Et tu, Ginsberg, Sotomayor, Kagan?<br /><br />It isn't all bad news. The court did allow that police could politely push pro-lifers back a few feet so that women entering clinics wouldn't have to shift into broken field running to get around the blockers.<br /><br />Another irony mentioned by Karen is the fact that the 252-foot barrier at the entrance of the Supreme Court still stands.Jay–Ottawahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10360356126450612113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-974773076690597683.post-36119320606843361012014-06-30T23:06:04.822-04:002014-06-30T23:06:04.822-04:00I hope this one gets printed in Truthout. You were...I hope this one gets printed in Truthout. You were really in the zone when you wrote this one, Karen!annenigmanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-974773076690597683.post-9474063364987113282014-06-30T19:05:33.454-04:002014-06-30T19:05:33.454-04:00“The Court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield,...“The Court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield,” wrote Justice Ginsburg in her dissent from the 5-4 ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby. “Approving some religious claims while deeming others unworthy of accommodation could be perceived as favoring one religion over another, the very risk the [Constitution's] Establishment Clause was designed to preclude.”<br /><br />Who else will now be able to ignore which laws on what religious grounds?<br /><br />“The free men of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. They saw all the consequences in the principle, and they avoided the consequences by denying the principle. We revere this lesson too much soon to forget it. Who does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other Religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of all other Sects? that the same authority which can force a citizen to contribute three pence only of his property for the support of any one establishment, may force him to conform to any other establishment in all cases whatsoever?” - James Madison, Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, 1785<br /><br />“Those who would renegotiate the boundaries between church and state must therefore answer a difficult question: why would we trade a system that has served us so well for one that has served others so poorly?” - Sandra Day O'Connor<br /><br />There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action - in our era of social media - many have been taking their rage over the Hobby Lobby decision out on the SCOTUSblog (which reports on SCOTUS) and not the SCOTUS' blog. The same uninformed people who voted, even though they had no idea what was going on in politics, for those responsible to the current composition of SCOTUS? Yolo, proof of the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.Denis Nevillenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-974773076690597683.post-34006858546339561022014-06-30T17:27:45.523-04:002014-06-30T17:27:45.523-04:00Let them eat cake. Can the blade be far away?Let them eat cake. Can the blade be far away?James F Traynornoreply@blogger.com