"They were careless people, Tom and Daisy
- they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into
their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that kept them
together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made." -- F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby.
If there's one positive thing you can say about the ruling class, it's that they usually err on the side of taking care of their own. As much as some of their peers smash things up, there's always a ready supply of Elite Miracle Glue to put them together again.
Political appointee James Comey of the FBI performed his own mess-cleaning role on Tuesday by issuing an ass-covering non-indictment indictment of Hillary Clinton. He accused her of "carelessness" in the handling of her correspondence as she acted out her own politically-appointed part as Secretary of State. But because she is a duly recognized member of the Class, there will be no charges, trial or jail time. That kind of justice is reserved for the little people and for government whistle-blowers like Chelsea Manning. Comey admitted that the scope of the FBI probe was kept as artificially narrow and piecemeal as her corporate-sponsored presidential platform itself.
He as much as admitted that the FBI "investigation" was political window dressing:
The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not
individually read the content of all of her e-mails, as we did for those
available to us; instead, they relied on header information and used
search terms to try to find all work-related e-mails among the
reportedly more than 60,000 total e-mails remaining on Secretary
Clinton’s personal system in 2014. It is highly likely their search
terms missed some work-related e-mails, and that we later found them,
for example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space
of a server.
It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they
did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that
are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to
State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to
preclude complete forensic recovery.
So despite obstruction of justice on the part of Clinton and her minions, no charges of obstruction of justice will be forthcoming. As commenter Scott W observed in a New York Times comment, Richard Nixon must be writhing with jealousy in his grave.
Comey continued,
We have conducted interviews and done technical examination to attempt
to understand how that sorting was done by her attorneys. Although we do
not have complete visibility because we are not able to fully
reconstruct the electronic record of that sorting, we believe our
investigation has been sufficient to give us reasonable confidence there
was no intentional misconduct in connection with that sorting effort.
All-righty then. As long as you don't actually intend to kill somebody during your drunk-driving adventure, no charges will be leveled if you're rich enough and powerful enough. Paris Hilton must also be writhing with jealousy, after having had to spend a couple of days in jail for her DUI in which absolutely nobody was ever harmed.
Hillary's only "crime," if we read between Comey's lines, is that she may have endangered the security of other members of the Establishment. Bad actors like Vlad Putin could have gotten hold of some embarrassing stuff, due to Hillary's irresponsible penchant for privacy and paranoia throughout her global travels. Important people may still end up looking bad. But that is certainly no felony if you are a rich and powerful person yourself.
And like the feckless Daisy Buchanan before her, Hillary was immediately whisked away from her own hit-and-run to both political glory and legal safety. High above the clouds and then high before the crowds, she had Barack Obama to give her some much-needed cover. (Bill Clinton, the ever-unreliable antihero of this saga, has been temporarily banished from the stage in the wake of his purely social private airplane tryst with Comey's boss, the politically-appointed Justice Doyenne Loretta Lynch.)
Despite (or because of) what should have been the embarrassment of a nationally televised FBI tongue-lashing, Clinton and Obama put up a brave orchestrated front, staying together for the sake of the never-ending Party. To deflect any potential audience disgust at the Clintonian antics, Obama strove mightily to aim the popular wrath toward the most loathsome strawman-in-the flesh rich guy ever to be dreamed up by the Ruling Class: Donald Trump.
Dredging up that booming, stammering, down-home, G-droppin' style we haven't heard since he last played the populist against private equity vulture Mitt Romney, Obama (who is now reportedly plotting his own career in venture capitalism) was in full lesser-evil mode. As New York Times columnist Frank Bruni put it, he didn't just ask that we vote for Hillary. He commanded us to vote for Hillary in "a testimonial that was both gushing and epic."
You see, the media wants you to know that it's Obama's ruling class legacy - not the survival of the working class and the underclass - that's actually on the line here:
Then
you look up toward the end of your second term to behold a Republican
presidential nominee who is cynically exploiting racism and xenophobia
to put the White House within his own reach. He’s not merely your
adversary; he’s your antithesis. And his victory would do more than
endanger your policies. It would question the very moral of your
journey, the very bend of the arc you frequently invoke.
That’s
what Barack Obama confronts right now, and that’s why he hit the
campaign trail on Tuesday, appearing onstage with Hillary Clinton in
North Carolina and proclaiming without reservation that “there has never
been any man or woman more qualified for this office” than she. That’s
why he’ll say words like those again and again, with the same fire, in
the months ahead.
For
the nation’s first black president, Clinton isn’t just the better
candidate. She’s the better America. She wins and he holds on to his
rosiest convictions about what he and his presidency symbolize.
As I responded to an unsigned Times editorial politely requesting more "clarity" from Clinton regarding her carelessness:
The televised spectacle of the Clinton campaign rally in the immediate
aftermath of James Comey's scathing assessment of her competency was
downright surreal.
The North Carolina crowds chanting "I'm with
her! I'm with her!" and President Obama proclaiming Hillary to be the
most qualified and "tested" presidential candidate who ever lived was
like something out of a Fellini film.
It's only the continuing
atrocity of the Trump candidacy and his Nuremberg rallies that's making
Hillary look even remotely morally acceptable to many voters. Because
who would ever have thought that a major candidate being lambasted by
the head of the FBI for serial venality and recklessness could be
tempered and even subsumed in the news cycle by that other major
candidate - who, it is obvious, has yet to reach his own outer limits of
sociopathy?
It's a sad time in the USA, when the two nominees are competing mainly
to see who can win or deflect the most negative media attention. Comey
rips Hillary to shreds on character and judgment, while the Speaker of
the House rips Trump another new one for yet another sick outburst of
racism.
The Clinton-Trump death match could well be the kiss of
death to the corrupt, money-driven duopoly. Now might be the optimal
time for those third and fourth parties to fill the vacuum.
The only spoilers in the mix are Trump and Clinton themselves.
Forget about whether America is great, greater or greatest. We want our democracy back.