"Just you wait, you nasty Republicans, until 2018 or 2020, or the next century, when people will finally -finally! - wise up to your shenanigans!" is the common refrain echoing from the Democratic leadership and their all-too-complicit co-dependents in the mass media.
In a clueless nod to Stanley Kubrick's satiric masterpiece about bumbling Russophobes in high places, New York magazine chirpily offers "6 Reasons For Progressives To Stop Worrying and Love the GOP Tax Scam."
They are so very heartening that I'm sure you already know them all by heart. All together now:
1. It's so horrible, all that Dems need do is to sit back and relax and a restoration of "power" shall be theirs due to a mass outpouring of ruefully grateful voters. You can literally run as John Q. Generic, and you'll be a shoo-in.Now, if you still persist in seeing the light at the end of tunnel as the blinding glare of an oncoming locomotive ready to mow you down, rather than as a beacon of hope, then Frank Bruni of the New York Times has some strange love of his own to offer. Democrats should simply yank the Republicans' "values" talking points right out from under them, and make them their very own! (while still yammering away on Russia and partisan #MeTooism, of course, to show how original and bold they truly are.) They especially should not abandon the Clinton-Obama-Third Way lie that Deficits Matter and therefore give ammunition to the plutonomy's propaganda that social spending cuts which hurt regular people will have to - just have to! - offset the tax windfall for the obscenely rich.
2. When they do take back power, they will immediately expand the welfare state! ( just as Obama did back in 2009 when he had a Democratic super-majority in Congress and still rewarded Wall Street to the detriment of Main Street, and refused to use budget reconciliation as ruthlessly as the GOP has done this year.)
3. Trump raised taxes on everybody and therefore social democracy is inevitable! (um... large chunks of the middle class, unless they reside on the expensive coasts, will not realize they wuz robbed until about 2027, when their tax cuts are due to sunset even as the corporate rates remain permanent.)
4. It should mollify Democrats' fear of deficits! (as we all know from our study of recent history, Obama's first reaction to the Bush administration's trillion dollars' worth of war debt and tax cuts for the rich was to delay sunsetting the Bush tax cuts for the rich as payment to his own donors, as he offered a tepid stimulus package hiding even more tax cuts and gifts to high finance. He refused to consider Medicare for All, a guaranteed federal jobs program and living wage legislation, at the same time his Justice Department vigorously exonerated all the Wall Street malefactors. And then he used his supermajority to seat his infamous Deficit Reduction, or Cat Food, Commission.)
5. Blue states will be able to shield their own safety nets from GOP depredations! ( How? by raising state taxes, which have now been deemed non-deductible under Trump's federal codes? by taxing high-speed Wall Street trades, and Hollywood, and Silicon Valley to the hilt and thus do away with all the money that cash-needy Democratic candidates count on?)
6. Republicans probably won't have the votes for spending cuts! (But not to worry - there are always Democrats ready to play. If they were able to help put an end to long-term unemployment insurance benefits while they still had their majority during the Obama years, anything is possible.)
Bruni gushes forth with a noxious blend of market-beholden neoliberalism and war-mongering neoconservatism:
Where do I sign up for my admission ticket to the Big Tent? Do I interpret the light at the end of the tunnel hopefully, pragmatically or despairingly?Democrats are the party of fiscal responsibility because they don’t pretend that they can afford grand government commitments — whether distant wars or domestic programs — without collecting the revenue for them.Democrats are the party of patriotism, because they’re doing something infinitely more urgent and substantive than berating football players who kneel during the national anthem. They’re recognizing that a hostile foreign power tried to change the course of an American presidential election. They’re pressing for a full accounting of that. They’re looking for fixes, so that we can know with confidence that we control our own destiny going forward. The president, meanwhile, plays down the threat, and Republicans prop him up.Democrats are the party of national security. They don’t taunt and get into Twitter wars with the rulers of countries that just might send nuclear warheads our way. They don’t alienate longtime allies by flashing contradictory signals about their commitment to NATO. The leader of the Republican Party does all of that and more, denying the G.O.P. any pretense to stewardship of a stable world order.Democrats are the law-and-order party. While many Republicans and their media mouthpiece, Fox News, labor to delegitimize the F.B.I. and thus inoculate Trump, Democrats put faith in prosecutors, agents and the system.
My (Times censor-proof) published response to Bruni:
Moving the Democratic Party further right and claiming the moral high ground won't win elections. The dubious virtue of austerity for Main Street helped lose them a thousand seats in the past decade - a decade that saw the largest transfer of household wealth to the top 1% in our country's history.
Sure, blame gerrymandering. But Trump and the GOP will never be defeated if all that Dems can offer is "Incrementalism We Can Believe In." Trillion-dollar wars and world supremacy don't make up for the lack of universal health care and stagnating wages at home.
Even before Trump came along with his reckless tweets, America's "standing" was on the wane. Corporation-friendly trade deals and the global economic crisis caused by finance capital gone wild have destroyed millions of lives and livelihoods besides ours.
A new report co-authored by Thomas Piketty shows that the US is now the most unequal of all Western nations. This deliberately manufactured wealth gap will only intensify, as social and natural and political catastrophes become the new normal.
Our incarceration nation now imprisons one-third of all black men at some point in their lives, and on average, three US citizens are killed by law enforcement every 24 hours. Do you really think glorifying the FBI and the CIA, and scarifying about Russia, will fire up millions of oppressed people to come out and vote Democrat?
The Democrats don't need to be more like Republicans. They need to be more like New Deal Democrats.
3 comments:
The Bright Side of Despairing coin has an opposite side, namely the Despairing Side of Bright named Barack Obama.
The synopsis linked below of 'The Obama Years' is a quick read of 29 bullet points with links to sources backing them up to jog your memories so you can remember the good times. You might want to have a glass (or two) of Christmas cheer first though.
I recommend 'The Obama Years' to replace the 'Obama Scandals List' on the blog roll which has not been updated since 2011. This new list is comprehensive and a keeper.
https://twitter.com/eshaLegal/status/943234477156945920/photo/1
A fine post after another year of gutsy essays in the face of the reckless rich and their acolytes. You stand on the bright side of journalism, Karen, one of the magi giving splendid gifts, but all year 'round.
I used to say you should turn your back on posting in the Times, which certainly follows a different star. I've changed my mind. It's not a waste of time to alert readers who subscribe to that august paper that they're being routinely distracted, lied to and groomed to accept gross injustice as normal.
Accomplices of unjust bosses, like Bruni, must be unmasked and contradicted just as routinely until enough readers of papers like the Times finally catch on. Without writers like you, high in the Times commentary, most readers will remain comfortably lost in the fog of MSM propaganda, and the country will never amass enough citizens of the same mind to kick the bums out.
As for yesterday's round against Bruni, last time I looked, your comment was voted up to third, behind "Ami," who, thank the Lord, was on your side; alas both of you were behind smooth "Socrates," who, as I recall, is a one-eyed commenter who limits his critiques to bashing the Republican side of the Duopoly. At least you and Ami were there to point to the distortions and glaring omissions in Bruni's piece and the Socrates comment.
As we learn from the fate of journalists in places like Mexico and Malta, the work takes courage if practiced honestly. In this way it is nonviolent as Gandhi and King defined nonviolence: its goal is to educate; it seeks justice, not revenge; and it's for the brave.
When FDR gave that speech he was 54 years old, already President for four years.
Who is our candidate who'd be 50 in 2020? I've never even heard a name.
New ideas. Vigor. That is what Kennedy would have called it. And he was 46 when he was assassinated.
Those two are what we need. In a woman, even better. Yet what do we have? And why?
It is a matter not of who is worthy, but of who can assemble donor money, with a track record of donor obedience to prove trustworthy to them. That is plainly what Hillary sold, and it was her control of that money that allowed her to tank Bernie.
We can describe who we need. We know why we don't get that person. The path out is the populism of Bernie, not the populism of Trump.
Post a Comment