Sunday, February 18, 2018

Keep the Russiagate Revenue Flying: Update

Part of Donald Trump's timeless, if limited and grotesque, appeal is that he occasionally blunders into the unvarnished truth. So it is with his latest tweeted observation that "they're laughing their asses off in Moscow" over the indictment by Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller of three companies including Russian troll farm and thirteen of its grossly underpaid sock puppets. The American powers that be would actually have us believe that a Russian oligarch who got started in the troll business attacking bad reviews of his rancid hot dogs is waging an all-out attack against our "democracy" by bringing his cheesy marketing campaign to our own precious shores.

The fact that Mueller released his "blockbuster" indictment at the start of a three-day holiday weekend is the first clue that it's mainly a combination of old news and partisan agitprop. Because whenever government officials want unpleasant or misleading news to be as unexamined as possible, they release it in News Dump Prime Time: the start of a long holiday weekend, rather than bright and early on a Monday morning, when bright-eyed reporters and pundits are scrambling for something new to talk about and analyze and disseminate in the greatest numbers.

Even so, when even Russiagate true believers like the Washington Post are taking notice that Mueller actually cut and pasted a significant portion of the indictment from a Russian magazine piece published last fall by actual Russian journalists, you kind of get the feeling that this indictment is not so much a rancid hot dog as a nothing-burger. It's old news being blown out of all proportion. It's a hunk of gristle thrown out for a ravenous media establishment to chew on in the lack of any new meaty blockbusters about Trump-Russia "collusion." 

 Adam Taylor of the Post writes:
In a 4,500-word report titled “How the 'troll factory' worked the U.S. elections,” journalists Polina Rusyaeva and Andrey Zakharov offered the fullest picture yet of how the “American department” of the IRA used Facebook, Twitter and other tactics to inflame tensions ahead of the 2016 vote. The article also looked at the staffing structure of the organization and revealed details about its budget and salaries....
 Zakharov explained how it was a strange feeling seeing something he had so closely investigated become a major issue in the United States, when it had not been a “bombshell” when he published his report at home.
Zakharov confirmed to the Post that people, if not "the Kremlin" itself, are indeed laughing their asses off.  "A lot of Russian conservatives were proud," he said. "They said: 'Look at what Russians can do! Only 90 people with $2 million made America scared! We are strong!' And for conservative people here, they see that Americans have CNN, Radio Free Europe, etc., that cover Russia. They say, 'Why can’t we establish groups in America and have our own influence?' That's how conservative people think here. They think this was normal."

The troll farm workers should probably demand a raise from the rancid hot dog oligarch. After all, if the tsar freed the Russian serfs in the 19th century,  the ruling oligarchs who have now inherited the earth should free them anew and pay them more than the paltry grand or so a month that they're currently making.

This is so reminiscent of other sock puppet campaigns, such as the "Correct the Record" troll farm run by Clintonoid flack David Brock. Poorly paid (even unpaid) trolls would flood the Internet comment boards with boilerplate attacks every time some actual person criticized their candidate. I can't tell you how many times these anonymous posters would accuse me, personally, of hurting Hillary's chances - and later actually personally costing her the election all by myself - every time I had something nice to say about Bernie Sanders, or something unflattering to say about Hillary herself on New York Times comment threads.  Who knew I had so much power at my typing fingertips? I don't know whether to laugh my ass off or cry in despair whenever one of these rancid sock puppets still digitally gets in my face and accuses me of being a Russian stooge, a closet Republican Trump operative, an anti-feminist, or all three.

As the Los Angeles Times reported about Brock's troll farm in May 2016, toward the end of primary season,
“It is meant to appear to be coming organically from people and their social media networks in a groundswell of activism, when in fact it is highly paid and highly tactical,” said Brian Donahue, chief executive of the consulting firm Craft Media/Digital.
“That is what the Clinton campaign has always been about," he said. "It runs the risk of being exactly what their opponents accuse them of being: a campaign that appears to be populist but is a smokescreen that is paid and brought to you by lifetime political operatives and high-level consultants.”
The task force designed to stop the spread of online misinformation and misogyny is the brainchild of David Brock, a Clinton confidant who once made a career of spreading such misinformation and misogynistic attacks against her and Bill Clinton. His critics say he kept his taste for dirty tricks when he switched sides to become one of the Clintons’ most valued operatives.
Although the "operatives" employed by Correct the Record were actually caught posting pornographic content on Bernie Sanders social media pages, no investigations or indictments of Brock's troll farm were ever forthcoming from the FBI and the Justice Department. Because only American trolls and corporations and the Kochs and the Adelsons and the Sinclairs are ever allowed to meddle in American elections.

In the interests of democracy and fairness and international good will, I think we should stage at least one televised debate between the Russian trolls and the American trolls to determine once and for all who can shout out their boilerplate talking points the loudest. For one thing, they work cheap (if not absolutely free), and would cost the corporate media conglomerates practically nothing. For another thing, they would bring in huge ratings and revenue for the corporate media, which is all that really matters in our politics-as-spectator sport "democracy." Naturally, such a show would have to be staged in a secret offshore location to protect the Russian trolls from actually being arrested as a result of Mueller's indictment. I would suggest a real working farm, with the stage adorned by various high-tech agricultural implements, the better to sow the chaos and the discontent. They'll have a wonderful time threshing it all out and making lots of hay as the oligarchs who own both countries reap all the unjust rewards for themselves.

The specially selected audience could be fitted out with truth-o-meters in order to measure their emotional responses to each troll. The grand prize for most effective trollery and flame-throwing might even be a contract for a paid gig on CNN or MSNBC or Fox as a part-time contributor.

Russiagate would be such a fun, farcical spectacle were it not for the fact that both the countries involved hoard vast quantities of nuclear weapons. Their greed instinct is threatening to overtake their survival instinct, to the detriment of every living thing on this planet.

4 comments:

  1. The Washington Post ran 16 anti-Bernie articles in 16 hours, but we're supposed to worry about 13 Russian trolls allegedly influencing the election by posting memes that were so stupid and ridiculous as to be almost pointless except for who they pointed to - the Great Satan Russia.

    The fact that the memes were so cartoonishly idiotic means they were deliberately meant as entertainment to attract click$, not 'warfare' or an 'influence campaign' run by the Kremlin. Speak of influence campaigns, they couldn't hold a candle our dark forces who insinuate themselves into everything, from movies, tv shows, and books to news reports and sporting events and everything in between. For example, the Marjorie Stoneman Douglas school in Florida has an active JROTC program to prepare children for the military. Some of the victims as well as the shooter participated in that military indoctrination program. I suppose their JROTC program, unlike the NRA, is safe from criticism because of their sacred status.

    So how is it that 13 Russians running moronic ads can be charged with defrauding the U.S. but not one single bank was even investigated or indicted (if only for show), for mortgage fraud? I guess when there's a guarantee that no defendants will stand trial, no evidence will be scrutinized, and no discovery phase will occur, it's safe to go through the motions, especially when they can bag two innocents with guilt by association: Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Poor Obama. Poor Democrats. They have a lot to answer for. "Oh what a tangled web..."

    Since this Russian war on our democracy is being likened to Pearl Harbor and 9/11 and supposedly began in (or around) 2014 when Obama was President, why isn't Mueller investigating Obama and his Intelligence regime? Obama did nothing during this dangerous attack on our nation. That suggests that he either tacitly approved or actually colluded with Vladimir Putin.

    Trump wasn't President, Obama was. Trump wasn't even a candidate during most of this 'attack', yet Trump's failure to condemn Russia is offered as proof of his collusion. Doing nothing while we're under attack, at least according to the Democrats when it applies to Trump, means 'Treason!'. Well, Obama isn't saying anything, and he sure didn't do anything to protect Hillary being defeated by Putin, I mean Trump.

    ***What did Obama and his Intelligence regime know and when did they know it?***

    Was the troll attack really only a limited and discrete operation and not part of a longer, larger attack predating 2014, when both Hillary and Mueller were serving? 2014 is a convenient cut-off point. It could have started earlier. Or was there always no there there?

    An investigation into the 2012 election is called for because Putin could have helped Obama win for the same reason he favored Trump - friendly deal maker. Obama signaled his friendliness to Putin loud and clear during the debate when he disagreed with Romney about Russia being the greatest threat: "The 1980s are calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War's been over for 20 years". Music to Putin's ears! Even Baby Bush looked into Putin's eyes and saw his soul, so let's warm up the Wayback Machine. Why do FOVs, Friends of Vladimir, keep winning?

    There's other supporting evidence against Obama. He went easy on Russia and Syria, cut a nuclear deal with Russia's buddy Iran, approved Hillary's Uranium sale to Russia, etc. Russia would have wanted Obama to win and he did, twice. Very suspicious.

    We don't need Russia to point out the rot in D.C., but they could be instrumental in our finally seeing it. We can already smell it - it smells like a cover-up protecting Obama and his Intelligence regime.

    Turnabout is fair play, Democrats!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is this Mueller's best shot after nine months of investigation? Would it be a federal offense to laugh our asses off at his finds, which so far boil down to probable sleazy operations by grifters Manafort and Gates with their Russian counterparts, and now this Russian troll farm? That's it? As Comrade points out, there's a lot more sleaze and trolling closer to home deserving a hard look by investigators, journalists and concerned reformers striving to make social media faux free.

    ReplyDelete
  4. i had to scroll down pretty far under "reader's picks" in comments to Chas Blow's latest piece to find a response that made any sense.

    Of course it was penned by Garcia.

    Good job.

    ReplyDelete