Monday, September 17, 2018

Decoding the Umpteenth Rising of Hillary

What better time for Hillary Clinton to cash in with the rest of the Democratic Doomsday Cartel than right before the congressional and statehouse elections?

Straight Outta The Atlantic

Fresh off her sticker-selling Internet campaign for the little people,  Clinton has now penned a self-righteous "op-ed" in The Atlantic aimed at members of her own class. The first tell is that she uses the pronoun "we" and not "you" when she offers her litany of dangers to "democracy", or should I say, the oligarchy. And lest you get the mistaken impression that she is entirely altruistic in her concern, there is this tiny-print nugget at the end of the piece: 
This essay was adapted from the afterword of the paperback edition of What Happened, which will be published on September 18.
As Ralphie groused about the Little Orphan Annie Secret Decoder Pin Ovaltine scam in A Christmas Story, "It's nothing but a lousy commercial!"

 This isn't to say that lousy commercialism is anything new or unexpected. There's always a profit motive in modern politics. Making money is what the recent mass outpouring of angst about Trump by the permanent Ruling Class essentially is. What they call the public good is really the private good of the rich and the well-connected. Trump sells, and not only for his own greedy benefit.

So it matters not that Hillary Clinton's essay is the epitome of self-serving hypocrisy and that each of her anti-Trump talking points apply just as aptly to her and her husband, and that her invective is a de facto boomerang. She doesn't care if everybody in the bottom 90% knows she is a bundle of lies. There are the "irredeemable" bottom-dwellers in her Basket of Deplorables whom she despises openly. And then there are those obsequients who are simply too afraid of Trump to criticize Democrats. These groups can effectively cancel each other out, as far as she and her cohort are concerned. And what's left of the Left? Sniff. She endorsed corrupt right-wing New York Governor Andrew Cuomo over progressive Cynthia Nixon. That "special place in hell for women who don't support other women" dreamed up by Madeline Albright only ever applied to Bernie Sanders supporters.

So the hypocrisy of condemning Trump over his imprisonment of migrant children when Hillary just two years ago called for sending refugee kids back where they came from to send a stern message to their irresponsible parents is easily ignored. Instead, she concentrates on the "monstrosity" of Trump lying about deaths of Puerto Ricans in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria, rather than concentrating on how private equity vultures and members of her own party have long been agitating for the neoliberal austerity regimen which was immiserating residents of the Commonwealth long before Trump gleefully threw paper towels at them.

 If you're feeling nauseous right about now, but hate the chalky taste of Pepto Bismol, then give Clinton's commercial a read. It'll feel like sticking your finger down your throat to make yourself vomit. But if that prospect sounds too intense, I'll put on my Secret Decoder ring to transmit the gist of it:

Trump does so many despicable, deplorable things and tells so many loathsome lies she can't keep track of everything, although she did keep track of that one time he told 125 lies in 120 minutes. John Adams certainly never called Thomas Jefferson "Crooked Thomas" during that presidential race. And she can certainly relate, because Jefferson owned slaves and Hillary also oversaw prison slave labor during her time as Arkansas First Lady. You wouldn't ever catch her trying to upend the Status Quo! Not then, and not now and not ever.

Even though there is no evidence that Russia installed Trump in office, she will continue to treat this as her own personal truth. Trump is doing nothing to protect us against an unproven threat!

Trump is going after journalists. Although he hasn't shut down the corporate-owned media conglomerate, he would if he could. Hillary certainly never would, because as much as she hates the media, she never called them fake or insulted them. She had staff for that. She merely hid from them as much as she could on The Trail, in between those times that she used them to air her grievances against their unfairness toward her and Bill.

What's more, the Obama administration was also going after journalists with a record vengeance. And as newly-released documents reveal, Attorney General Eric Holder wrote a secret opinion in 2015 which casts US journalists as foreign agents and therefore fodder for surveillance under the draconian FISA Act.

Let me depart for a moment from the synopsis and insert this direct quote from the Atlantic infomercial:
When we can’t trust what we hear from our leaders, experts, and news sources, we lose our ability to hold people to account, solve problems, comprehend threats, judge progress, and communicate effectively with one another—all of which are crucial to a functioning democracy.
In other words, if people can't or won't swallow corporate propaganda whole, the Ruling Class suffers. Ordinary people lose the respect for corporate-controlled government that the oligarchs need to thrive and prosper. If the consent of the governed can no longer be manufactured by the self-serving Masters of the Universe, and the "narrative" cannot be narrowly proscribed, the aristocracy of the Secret Circle will find it increasingly hard to function under this renegade bomb-thrower of a president.

Now on with the sardonic interpretation of Hillary's message:

Trump refuses to release his tax returns, which is not comparable to Hillary's erasure of the State Department emails from her own secret server in her private basement. He is profiting from the presidency, while the hundreds of millions of dollars Bill and Hill raked in from the presidency and continue to rake in through their money-laundering influence-peddling charity are too noble to even be mentioned. Even though Trump is totally in it for his private gain, her paid speeches to Goldman Sachs, where she admitted that her public position is different from her private position, were stolen by Wikileaks and shouldn't be heeded. Kill the messenger and blame the Russians instead, even if you have to do it 125 times in 120 minutes, or at least in the space of an hour of Rachel Maddow. (Catch Hillary on Rachel tonight, by the way!)

Trump undermines the unity which normally makes bipartisanship for the rich such a great propaganda scam. When Hillary says Democracy is rowdy by nature, what she really means is that there are always these petty fake squabbles among the movers and shakers of the Ruling Class to keep us alternately entertained and numbed. As they tried to convey to the lesser people during the Great John McCain Funeral Spectacular, when George Bush shared his candy with Michelle Obama during a pre-arranged camera pan:
We debate freely and disagree forcefully. It’s part of what distinguishes us from authoritarian societies, where dissent is forbidden. But we’re held together by deep “bonds of affection,” as Abraham Lincoln said, and by the shared belief that out of our fractious melting pot comes a unified whole that’s stronger than the sum of our parts.
In the good old affectionate days, the Clintons were actually good transactional buddies with the Trumps. They even attended Donald and Melania's wedding. And normally, those "free debates" are carefully orchestrated by a corporation instead of by the quaint League of Women Voters, and pesky third and fourth party candidates are barred from appearing. And most recently, of course, the Bernie Sanders challenge was effectively quashed by purges of primary voting rolls and a severely truncated primary debate schedule. Although Hillary bought her way into control of the Democratic Party, this was not corrupt or authoritarian.

So now that it's that magical time of year when they allow people to vote and where corporate control of candidates does not apply in every single case, the aristocracy must fear-monger for all that it's worth. And it's worth a lot.

Therefore, Hillary will call for reform in the form of the same piecemeal solutions which catapulted her to a de facto victory on both coasts in 2016. Get the money out of politics, but not for her. Expand national service programs so that the lesser people, at little to no pay, can pretend they're making a difference and that this is really a democracy - when what they're really doing is protecting the status quo of extreme, obscene and unequal wealth. Let's have automatic voting registration too. And then making choosing between pre-vetted corporate candidates mandatory under law!

When we think about politics and judge our leaders, we can’t just ask, “Am I better off than I was four years ago?” We have to ask, “Are we better off? Are we as a country better, stronger, and fairer?” Democracy works only when we accept that we’re all in this together.
Accept your lot, proles. At least you are allowed to live in the same geographical space as your betters, so shut up already about Medicare For All and free higher education. Because the most pressing concern is that "we" (the very rich) stay better off. That's how fake Democracy works.

The End.

Or is it? 

This woman is not going away. They say the third time's a charm, so who's to say it can't also be a third chance for the charmless?

Pass the Ovaltine with a chaser of Pepto. 

10 comments:

chuck said...

Please excuse the off-topic comment. What do you make of the NY 19th CD election? I know some New Paltzers who are pledging to support a Democrat for every office no matter what, and I'm guessung this race may be a big reason.

Anna Radicalova said...

Oh wow, she's got such a big heart!

Hillary Clinton tweeted:
Tyrone Gayle, a beloved member of the HFA team, was known to stay at the office until midnight and run six miles the next morning. Now, his friend (and fellow HFA alum) Jesse is running to raise funds for Tyrone as he fights cancer. Pitch in if you can.

Walker Bragman Retweeted Hillary Clinton:
Hillary Clinton, whose net worth is $45 million and who said on the campaign trail that single-payer "will never, ever come to pass," asks for crowdfunding assistance for her former staffer's medical expenses.

Jay–Ottawa said...

It's in the nature of comebacks that neither principals nor bystanders ever know which way it'll go, up like a kite or down like a kite, no matter how fast the image makers run against the wind. An embittered Nixon upon loosing the governorship of California in '62 told the press corps he despised: "... you don't have Nixon to kick around any more, because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference." Then, on 20 January 1969, he was on top of the world once again. Unbelievable.

Umm, Botticelli's beautiful soul inserted as a visual into the story at this point is a surprise. Or is it? It stands in contradiction to Oscar Wilde's "Portrait of Dorian Gray." Dorian himself stayed beautiful; his painting became more grotesque over the years. For modern politicians Wilde's pattern get flipped. So much money goes into keeping the celebrity's image attractive; but give the living, breathing version a hard look, and you'll see the horrific.

For a contemporary example of image or myth surpassing reality, see the John McCain story. The images of Bill Clinton and George Bush are also on the mend. In no time they will have been completely rehabilitated and can be assured of grand funerals in big cathedrals.

We must not discount the rebirth of Hillary as a great soul, a new Venus, at least compared to the combed over satyr now in office. In some cases, as with Trump, both the image and the reality are deplorable.

Will the good guys and gals, wherever they are, never rid us of such troublesome politicians? These hopeful lines [lightly edited] from a Scottish poet (whose real name was not Hugh MacDiarmid) may help us hang on through our own age of post-fact.

It is a God-damned lie to say these schnooks
Accomplished anything worth any man’s pride.
They were professional criminals and they took
Their corporate cash and their stupid risks and lied.
In spite of all their kind some elements of worth
With difficulty persist here and there on earth.

Karen Garcia said...

@Chuck

New York 19 is turning into Carpetbagger Central for the Democrats. This year, their candidate is Antonio Delgado, who moved out of New Jersey and bought a house in Rhinebeck just so he could run here. At least, unlike the Facebook billionaire who ran last time, he was born in the district before going on to bigger and better things. He is a clone of Obama: Harvard Law grad who now works in a lobbying firm, though reportedly not as an actual lobbyist. He is a former rapper and music producer, and therefore the perfect opponent for John Faso of the GOP, a really nasty racist piece of work. So despite the fact that Delgado is a corporate Dem who refuses to endorse Medicare For All, people are being manipulated into supporting him based on his rags to riches identity politics and as a way to "resist" both Trump and Faso, who is about five points ahead in the polls. Delgado beat out a couple of quite progressive challengers in the primary, likely because he had the big bucks and they didn't.

Other than that, the big news is that one of those challengers, Diane Neal of Law and Order SVU fame is now running as an independent after initially getting kicked off the ballot because of a "problem" with her signatures. Hmmm... wonder where that came from. Anyway, she sued and won.

Steve Green of New Paltz is running again on the Green Party ticket. I voted for him last time and will likely do so again. And no, I don't consider myself a spoiler for failing to support a Democrat who will not make peoples' lives better. As far as I'm concerned the Democrats are the ones who spoil things when they run corporatized centrists.





Karen Garcia said...

@Anna,

Thanks for sharing that noxious tidbit. It was like another finger down the throat. Every time you think this woman can't be more of a clueless psychopath, she outdoes your lowest expectations.

@Jay,

Yeah, the Venus pic was satirically meant. A cut and paste of Hillary's actual self rising from the ocean (Atlantic) would have been just one more unnecessary finger down the throat.

Botticelli, who painted the masterpiece, willingly threw a lot of his art into the Bonfire of the Vanities, a place where Hillary will certainly never willingly go!

chuck said...

Thanks, Karen.

A TV ad for Delgado talking about Faso's support for dismantling the ACA is being aired in NYC. You're right, no mention of MfA.

What a mess you guys have up there. I don't see how Faso is not going to win reelection.

Mad Max said...

Splendid takedown of Hillary’s hypocritical sanctimony!

Anna Radicalova said...

The NYT's 'The Plot to Subvert an Election' is a sure sign that imperial rulers are maneuvering Hillary Clinton to restore her rightful place as President. Delegitimizing Trump and the election and demonizing Putin and Russia is integral to softening up the 2020 election battlefield and setting the stage for Hillary's grand re-entry in her 'Fairness' Campaign. Like her or not, she deserves the Presidency more than evah!

If Hillary hadn't been thought to be a certain winner by a landslide in 2016, we would have witnessed the ruthlessness that the Clintons are capable of. Stay tuned. Haven't we already seen the preview, starting the day after her loss? The next time, Hillary 'Machine Gun' Clinton will really be unleashed. She's got the anger, bitterness, ambition, and righteousness to fuel her and she surely won't be too tired to campaign in Wisconsin, etc.

No one gets more down-and-dirty than the Clintons and their Machine, especially when they're up against a wall. With Big Media and Big Money on their side and eager to ramp up the campaign, she's a sure bet to take on Trump. There's no one else who can come close to defeating him. Besides, think of the drama. It would be like a prize fight.

The NYT says "For two years, Americans have tried to absorb the details of the 2016 attack: hacked emails, social media fraud, suspected spies — and President Trump’s claims that it’s all a hoax. The Times explores what we know and what it means."

"What it means" is that it's our patriotic duty to defend this attack on democracy by restoring the rightful winner of the election to office, and that means pinning Hillary's loss on Putin and no one else. They're going to keep hammering us with that message until November of 2020.

Does it ever even cross their minds how insulting it is to voters to be told that they were manipulated by a small social media troll factory operation as if they didn't have personal agency and decades of Clinton corruption to inform their voting decision? Apparently not. It doesn't fit their narrative.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/09/20/us/politics/russia-interference-election-trump-clinton.html

As far as 'Machine Gun' Clinton goes, she recently began firing off tweets and shooting off her mouth to Rachel Madcow, leading the media war to delegitimize President Trump and the election. With the NYT and other heavie$ on her side, this ugly campaign will go on even if it destroys the country.

Actually, that could work to their benefit since law and order is right up Machine Gun Clinton's alley and is a money maker for the ruling class cabal. They already loathed the ignorant, deplorable masses before they elected Trump, now they fear them too.

https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton

Karen Garcia said...

@Anna,

You can tell that this piece is pure propaganda by the way it is constructed. Normally the lede in a straight news piece consists of the most salient facts. This piece reads more like a spy novel, with scary suppositions in the forefront and only slowly building up to the flimsy evidence. They are taking Russian "interference" in the US elections and trying to slant it into direct collusion between Trump and Putin. And not only that, they are insinuating that a foreign country infiltrated the brains of the US populace, which is really kind of insulting when you think about it. It's really the Times and other corporate media outlets that are trying to infiltrate brains in order to scare people into voting for Democrats. Why else would they include those super-scary horror movie images of Putin?

It's telling that there is, as of yet anyway, no reader comment section appended to the piece. Although I am sure the most highly recommended ones would agree wholeheartedly with the propaganda, given how thoroughly its been driven into the psyches of the loyal regular readership, it's like they don't want to risk even the slightest pushback.

This is going to the season of the hysterical Hail Mary pass, from now until November.

And yes, they're ginning up enthusiasm for Hillary 3.0. Unfortunately, they're preaching to the choir on both coasts. Everybody else is either too cynical or too busy working two or three low-paying jobs to pay attention... assuming they can afford the $15 monthly subscription to the Times.

It's a wasted effort, and a story they have to continue telling to themselves to justify themselves. There is no longer much news in the newspaper.

Jay–Ottawa said...

What is unfolding so quickly is too neat to be a series of accidental happenings bumping into each other. A cabal, way up where major pieces can be moved around and cued, has to have scripted this opera. Such exquisite timing is art.

The overture played long before the curtain finally went up last week. By overture I mean the developing strains of Trump Derangement Syndrome and the mounting drumbeat about a sneak attack by the Russians on Hillary and democracy itself. A third strain is Mueller's glooshmaker long in the production phase with periodic leaks.

Act One, Scene 1: Woodward's insider book about the crazy White House. Scene 2: that ludicrous op-ed by Clueless Anonymous in the NY Times. Scene 3: a big stall in the Brett Kavanaugh appointment thanks to the appearance of another #MeToo ghost from Christmas past; Scene 4: the Times's "breaking" news" out today: "Unraveling the Russia Story So Far."

Gotta love that "so far" tail in the headlines. Still to come: Mueller's big aria, sometime after the 2018 election.

It's not a story; it's an opera. The lead players are Trump and Hillary, just like the previous opera with the surprise ending. Let's see how a different ending next time around goes down in 2020 with the American people.