Friday, May 17, 2019

Slow-Jamming #Resistance, Inc.

Like neglected children, congressional Democrats are once again pinning all their hopes on Deadbeat Dad Robert Mueller III. The chief Russiagate investigator had come under liberal fire in recent weeks not only for failing to make the facts fit MSNBC's conspiracy theories, but for not immediately disowning Attorney General William Barr's semi-accurate spin on the long-awaited report.

Therefore, the Desperate Dems hope to haul Mueller in the actual flesh before their committees to try and elicit the secret inner workings of his mind. If he gives them what they want, who knows? He might even be re-elevated to the Father of Our Country status he had enjoyed for the past couple of years. As long as they could count on getting their child support payments, with interest, in the not-too-distant future, they were quite content these past few years to subsist on their own speculative hot air as the official gourmet feast was being quietly and painstakingly prepared for them.

It's safe to say that the Democrats are now officially in the bargaining phase of their Five Stages of Russiagate Grief. Still awaiting salvation and sustenance from Mueller, whose public testimony is still far from a done deal, they've had to satisfy themselves this week with another marathon reading, this time with a cameo by John Cusack, of the entire redacted Mueller report. Unlike the usual grandstanding Congressional theatrics, though, the ensemble cast's bravura performance was conducted in a private room and live-streamed on C-Span for viewing by anybody with 12 masochistic hours to kill.

House Judiciary Chair Adam Schiff was certainly not sated by the performance, demanding to hear from Mueller himself, because "seeing is believing, hearing is believing." In other words, if only Mueller can channel his inner Rachel Maddow, all might be forgiven.

Unless and until it is proven otherwise by the special counsel himself,  the suspicion lingers that Mueller could have written his report under the influence. He might not have written or redacted the report himself. He could even be a Russian asset. The revered elder statesman that everybody assumed was Mueller could even be an alien pod person who took over Mueller's body when we weren't looking. This is far more plausible than it sounds, given that Mueller has rarely been seen and virtually never heard in public during the years that everybody naively assumed he was carefully plodding through his investigation and discovering the desired facts. 

So if Mueller finally does appear before Congress and he does stick to his findings, the next step of the Desperate Dems might include using advanced technology to discern whether his eyes turn into red pulsating pinwheels while he stands firmly by his written words. At the very least, they can produce body language experts to interpret the testimony, and cable talking heads can count how many times Mueller blinks every time he persists in alleging that there was no grand conspiracy between Trump and Putin.

The New York Times cuts right to the chase and reports that the Democrats' biggest fear is that they are not keeping the manufactured public fear of TrumPutin and Russia sufficiently alive. People might actually be losing interest in the Mueller Report, which had immediately shot to the top of the bestseller lists when it was hastily printed, redactions and all, in book form last month. Things are now getting so fraught that Michelle Obama's memoir even threatens to reclaim its rightful place at Number One.

From the Times:
Any appearance by Mr. Mueller, however noncommittal or boring it turns out to be, is one of the only means to snap the issue of Mr. Trump’s actions back to center stage, they said, along with testimony from someone like Mr. (former White House chief counsel Don) McGahn.
Shakespeare was only partly right. All the world's a stage, for sure. But it's really not the play that's the thing when it comes to Washington theatrics. It's the relentless hyping of the play. It's the production of constant cliff-hangers to keep us binge-watching and riveted on anything except the myriad existential crises that the political class is doing nothing to address or remedy. 

With that truism in mind, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi finally allowed on Thursday that while she is still averse to bringing impeachment proceedings against Donald Trump, she is now a little more open to talking about impeachment. And who knows, she added, given that Trump is providing them new grounds for impeachment every single day with his obstructions of House subpoenas, he could even end up impeaching his own self with no effort even needed by the Democrats!

Impeachment doesn't necessarily mean a definite move to remove Trump from office, it means constructing a legal path to arrive at the facts, she cogently explained. Courts are also more likely to take Trump's obstruction seriously if the I word is tacked on to the Democrats' legal challenges to his recalcitrance.

 "You never say, blanketly, I'm not answering any subpoenas," Pelosi chided Trump at a different appearance Thursday at Georgetown University.

Blanketly? I checked, and it's a real adverb, meaning that one approach should never be applied to too many disparate things. Now, I may be too much of a literal thinker, but when I first read that statement, it immediately conjured up a mental picture of Linus stubbornly and blissfully clutching his security blanket despite Lucy's hectoring.




Marx was right about tragedy and farce. Not only does history keep repeating itself, the repetitions are now coming so close together that the genres seamlessly merge and become indistinguishable from one another. The messages become mixed and the actors all mixed up as the whole facade crumbles around them, and the curtain falls.

Until next time. Stayed tuned for another exciting episode. True, it may turn out to be as boring as the last one, but the anticipation alone is guaranteed to keep our eyes glued to the ubiquitous screens that, like Linus's lovey, have become virtual and indispensable parts of our physical and mental selves.

Lose our gadgets blanketly? Shut the blankety-blank up!

4 comments:

Jay–Ottawa said...


Thanks, Karen, for alerting us that the front page in America will, for the foreseeable future, continue to remain off topic. And we thought the Mueller Report would force the narrative back to reality.

Mueller One, which distracted the whole country for the first two Trump years, will now be replaced by (the Democratic House willing) Mueller Two or Impeachment 0.5 (Pelosi willing), either of which will provide enough hot air to carry us to the end of Trump's first term. Mueller Two or Impeachment 0.5 is all Rachel Maddow needs to rant on seamlessly into the campaign 2020.

Those of you who insist on obsessing about petty existential matters like the Sixth Extinction, the doomsday atomic clock, endless conventional (huh?) wars, economic disparity, crumbling infrastructure, subsidized ignorance, the loss of arable land around the world, and other un-newsworthy news stories, will have to be satisfied with digital cake delivered by TV, cable and––the new Linus Blanket––your never-leave-home-without-it Smart Phone.

Pity those lacking digital toys to distract them while, off the record, elites tear their fingernails from their roots.

Clueless It Seems said...

Just as you have been saying about the New York Slimes all along:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/19/digital-civil-war-review-trump-russia-republicans-media

Jay–Ottawa said...

@ Clueless

Until I had read the link you provided, which is a Clinton stalwart's defense of the DNC's party line, I had assumed your moniker was self-deprecating and ironic. Now I'm not so sure. Can you provide more information on why that Guardian article says something different or insightful? Seems like more of the NY Times spirit under a different banner.

Erik Roth said...


While the feckless Democratic Party elites bargain desperately to maintain the status quo long enough to get their turn on the see-saw, here are two insights to what else is in play.

"Why Liz Cheney Is So Determined to Marginalize Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar —
The Wyoming Republican has resorted to outrageous lies to vilify the first two Muslim women in the House.
She’s practicing the ugliest form of divide-and-conquer politics.
But it won’t work."
https://www.thenation.com/article/liz-cheney-rashida-tlaib-ilhan-omar/
MAY 14, 2019 ~ by John Nichols

Reps. Omar and Schakowsky: We must confront threat of white nationalism — together.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/14/opinions/stop-white-nationalism-together-omar-schakowsky/index.html
May 14, 2019 ~ by Ilhan Omar and Jan Schakowsky