The latest twist in the Jeffrey Epstein saga is that he died because both the guards who were supposed to be checking his cell at a Manhattan federal jail every thirty minutes fell asleep on the job, apparently simultaneously. And thus was Epstein, rank opportunist to the last, allowed to enter into his own eternal rest unimpeded. At a jail nicknamed The Tombs, no less.
The question is not why the jailers nodded off - one or both were working double shifts on top of several days of previous "severe overtime" - but why there were only two guards on duty to monitor some of the country's most dangerous criminal defendants in the first place.
The obvious reason is the severe budget-cutting in our neoliberal age of deficit hawkery. Prisoners, along with other perceived dregs of society, are a low priority when our corrupt political class has only so many trillions of dollars to allocate to war and weapons and corporate welfare for their wealthy benefactors. Their time is also severely limited, what with endless meetings with corporate lobbyists, the counting of their donors' weighted votes, and decisions about which low-priority groups to punish next. Should it be old people, sick people, hungry people, indebted students, prisoners?
Yep. All the above.
And the Trump administration, to help cover the cost of the massive tax cuts rewarding Jeffrey Epstein's class of tycoons, proposed in February that 1,000 more workers be cut from the federal prison system and that 6,000 additional jobs be eliminated through attrition.
"This isn't right, and this isn't safe for America. This isn't good policy, especially when you have a president of the United States that says he supports law and order," said Eric Young, president of the American Federation of Government Employees' Council of Prison Locals.
Jeffrey Epstein was a true anomaly, a near-billionaire Member of the Club who tragically got caught up in a carceral justice system which is usually reserved for the poor and the powerless and, occasionally, a notorious criminal like El Chapo. The Mexican drug lord was held accountable because he symbolized the Duopoly's War On Drugs, which is code for its war on poor drug-users. The drug-trafficking roles of the US Military and the CIA are thus more easily ignored or forgotten.
El Chapo, who spent two years in the same jail as Epstein until his conviction, had already been notorious for escaping from prison in Mexico. It thus seems highly unlikely that he was ever guarded by only two sleep-deprived staffers during his stay in a facility renowned for its ultra-tight security.
So my own conspiracy theory is that nobody had to directly murder Jeffrey Epstein in order to keep him quiet about all the important people he had dirt on for their participation in his various financial scams and global sex trafficking ring. All that some higher-up had to do was approve a whole bunch of vacations at the same time, and then force the remaining skeleton crew to work punishing overtime shifts. And as an added insurance policy, they assigned one staffer to the Epstein detail who wasn't even a trained guard.
Oops. Nobody could ever have predicted.... A full investigation will be launched.... Heads will roll - as long as they're unimportant heads.
Another unanswered question is why Epstein was even arrested and charged again, a full decade after completing his sweetheart deal of a sentence. I doubt very much that it was sudden concern for his victims in the Me Too era, mainly because the Trump administration and its Department of Justice are not exactly known for their empathy or altruism or sense of justice for all.
It could have been public pressure on the somewhat liberal Southern District of New York branch of the federal justice system after Julie K. Brown's blockbuster series about the sweetheart deal appeared in the Miami Herald.
But my suspicion is that Epstein's arrest, coming at this belated moment in time, was mainly done for political reasons. It could have been a way for Trump to get revenge on his former pals, Bill and Hillary Clinton, and a whole slew of other important Democratic politicians, celebrities and wealthy donor class liberals in Epstein's social circle. If the cache of documents released on the eve of Epstein's apparent suicide had implicated Trump in any major way, would they have been released?
It does kind of reek of oligarchic intra-class warfare, with Epstein's victims still being treated a bit like afterthoughts as the pundits argue about how many times Bill Clinton boarded the Lolita Express. Was it four, or 24, or even more?
The rumors of Epstein's possible double life as a Mossad agent or FBI informant certainly add to the intrigue and conspiracy-theorizing that's taken the country by storm. There has even sprung up a whole new media sub-genre of conspiracy-theorizing about the genesis of Epstein conspiracy theories. A sub-sub-genre is the narrative that if Donald Trump tweets out a conspiracy theory, it automatically makes everybody else proffering a similar theory a prima facie idiot by association. The churnalism being committed about the Epstein matter is even more deranged than usual.
The passive-aggressive drugging by sleep deprivation of Epstein's minders to effect Epstein's suicide makes perfect sense, because sleep deprivation of the masses is a primary form of socially controlling the masses. Chronically tired people don't think as critically, they tend to get sick a lot and eat poor diets, and they tend to die prematurely of such things as heart disease and diabetes.
Sleeping also eats into the profits of the owners and bosses. Sleeping is for slackers and losers. Those prison guards should have had better control over their brains and their circadian rhythms. Shame on them for sleeping on the job! They were members of a union, for crying out loud, plus they have taxpayer-funded pensions. What we need now, my friends, is the complete privatization-for-profit of our federal prisons to avoid any more Jeff-like tragedies in the future and to bring closure and justice to the future victims of predators that we prosecute whenever it's convenient or profitable to us to feign concern for lesser mortals.
As Jonathan Crary writes in 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep:
Sleep is the irrational and intolerable affirmation that there might be limits to the compatibility of living beings with the allegedly irresistible forces of modernization. One of the familiar truisms of contemporary critical thought is that there are no unalterable givens of nature - not even death, according to those who predict we will all soon be downloading our minds into digital immortality. To believe that there are any essential features that distinguish living beings from machines is, we are told by celebrated critics, naive and delusional. Why should anyone object, they would counter, if new drugs could allow someone to work at their job 100 hours straight?According to press reports, at least one of Epstein's guards had put in about a hundred hours in the preceding week. He or she apparently was not imbibing sufficient amounts of caffeine or other stimulants to stay awake. So what the plutocrats need is not a War on Drugs but a War for Drugs. Telling workers to sleep on their own time is meaningless, given that there is little to no free time for people to sleep, let alone enjoy themselves. More and more people can survive only by working several jobs or putting in double overtime shifts.
Rich people think they're immune from what they themselves have wrought, but by damaging their employees they are only hurting themselves and their partners in crime - including, as it turns out, Jeffrey Epstein.
Lack of sleep is deadly. Just days after Epstein offed himself, a New York City firefighter dropped dead of a heart attack after working a 24-hour shift.
Heads will roll. But only little, tortured, sleep-deprived heads.
6 comments:
Epstein was allegedly a near billionaire, but the source of the cash is super murky. He appears to have gotten his stake during an era about which there are plenty of rumors regarding America's own intelligence agency and its involvement in the global drug trade. El Chapo and Jefferey Epstein, indeed.
I haven't encountered any references to JE as an FBI informant other than here. As for the 'conspiracy-theorizing' bit about an Israel connection, why no mention of Maxwell, or Wexler, or the MEGA group?
OK, Capitalism and sleep deprivation are bad - but the Epstein affair is a huge story that a lot of powerful interests seem to want dismissed. This article reads kinda dismissy, IMO.
there is already plenty of reporting on the Epstein case out there and rehashing it all on this little blog would be redundant and time consuming. I am not dismissing the conspiracy theories per se but critiquing the media's negative preoccupation with them.. Many of these outlets, with vast financial resources, could be out pounding the pavement for new facts rather than obsessing over what Trump is tweeting and just generally acting like their echo chamber selves. I have written previously on the Epstein case and questioned why the corporate media seemed uninterested.. And that is probably more fodder for conspiracy theories..
If you're interested and have time to spare, Whitney Webb has a long-form essay (finished before Epstein's demise) connecting just about all the dots available for a deeper understanding of the Epstein chronicles, which go back to the 1920's. Part One of Three here:
https://www.mintpressnews.com/shocking-origins-jeffrey-epstein-blackmail-roy-cohn/260621/
Conspiracy theorists may find themselves in the same puzzle as Hercule Poirot throughout the early and middle stages of "Murder on the Orient Express."
Jay,
I was thinking the same thing - "they all did it."
Mint Press News is on my blogroll, and I have read some of the Whitney Webb pieces. What gives me pause is her listed contributions to the Ron Paul Institute and a few other iffy outlets. This is not to say that her reporting is suspect, only that we should read it critically. I notice that there already have been several corrections to her pieces by the editor of Mint Press. She certainly seems to have put in the time and done her research, in any case. She makes it all sound very plausible.
I have no way of knowing whether or not there exists the vast Likud-based, interlinked global crime conspiracy that she writes about, and I also have no way of verifying her journalistic credentials. She could be the new Izzy Stone for all I know. But whenever I hear the name Ron Paul, my radar perks up. You might remember that he was affiliated with the racist right-wing John Birch Society. Lots of progressives like him because many of his ideas make sense, like not waging war. But he also thinks people are on their own if they get sick or fall on hard times.
So I, personally, stick with what I know, which is why I choose to frame this whole sordid saga in terms of the global class war and how the corporate media covers it, or not.
I hope that a reporter like Seymour Hersh will get on the Epstein story, if he isn't already, to cover the global organized crime angle.
I often go to MintPress. Its reporters, like those at BAR, provide an unapologetic counterpoint to corporate media. But I agree, one has to be on guard even in friendly camps, even when they are defending, say, Palestinians, directly or obliquely. One must realize that, at bottom, MintPress was originally created to resist the Israeli government and its many ... um ... questionable works. But always the questioning: Is this or that article a stretch or the real dope?
Three hundred sixty degree skepticism is an essential habit in today's world. Are all the friends of my friends my friends? Are all the enemies of my friends my enemies? In this lovely world good and evil overlap like a many-tiered wedding cake.
To the point at hand, the Epstein saga, can that many top dogs in government, corporations and media be into aberrant sex, entrapment, blackmail, grand theft, assassinations and war on one overarching schedule?
For example, one of the major conspiracy theories of our time revolves around 9/11. As with all conspiracies of such dimension, the key to acceptance, at least for me, can only be the volunteered exit of a figure who was near the center of the presumed conspiracy.
Conspiracy-minded outsiders with all their skepticism, facts and unrelenting logic don't amount to a hill of beans UNTIL ... until a deep insider, like Binney, Manning, Snowden or Gravano, steps out of the cold and into the limelight with a mountain of data obtained first-hand from inside the dark operation. Only in that way, through an insider, can a conspiracy theory become something more than a collection of connected dots.
I doubt anyone will come out of the cold to prove the best of the conspiracy theories about Dallas '63 or 9/11. Likewise concerning Epstein's (predictable?) demise and all the yellow post-its being stuck to his coffin.
I doubt we will ever know for sure what happened to Epstein, absent a video or a confession. As Karen indicates, it is very easy to cause something to happen by indirection or dereliction in a bureaucracy. For example, once Whitey Bulger was sent from the prison in Florida to West Virginia, he was a dead man.
Post a Comment