Tuesday, September 24, 2019

Gates Foundation: Poor People Need Better P.R.

The problem with poor people is not that they don't have money. The problem with poor people is that they have horrible reputations. And billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates wants to repair those reputations by holding a contest to see who in the Creative Class can propose the best ways to "combat the false narratives" about poverty in America.

Ten lucky winners will receive grants of up to $100,000 each if their ideas meet the standards of a secret panel of "expert" judges. According to The Hollywood Reporter, entries may include the written word, performance pieces and documentary films.

The Gates Foundation still pretends to be utterly baffled about the root causes of the most extreme wealth inequality of modern times, in which eight or twelve oligarchs - including Bill Gates himself - have pocketed more cash than is owned by the bottom half of the entire global population. 

Thomas Piketty and other economists, along with presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, have thus proposed both domestic and global wealth taxes on these modern-day robber barons; their combined holdings could easily feed and house everybody on the planet who needs food and housing. But since the wealthy don't want to be taxed, they concern-troll instead, offering a mere pittance to "explore" ways to fix the very problems that they themselves have had an outsize hand in creating.

The poverty guru in charge of the Gates contest can't even explain its goals coherently. Although a Harvard-trained lawyer, Ryan Rippel sounds more like a graduate of the Joe Biden Culinary Institute For the Study of Word Salads: 
These stereotypes are so problematic in the search for solutions,” says Ryan Rippel, director of U.S. economic mobility and opportunity at the foundation.
“They cause us to demean people and not actually be in the conversation with a lens of humanity and a deep commitment to getting to the bottom of the nature of the challenge.”
Rippel never quite gets around to listing just what these stereotypes about poor people are.

His objective is the standard one beloved of philanthrocapitalism: to study the problems of poor people and in lieu of direct cash aid, to give money to experts who can study those problems some more. If poor people are consulted at all, it must be through the filter of rich people, or consultants and experts who get their funding from rich people and tax-averse corporations. Or, as Rippel so cogently explains on his web page, he is involved with "a number of partnerships to generate new data and public goods in service to those working to address barriers of opportunity."

Before poor people can ever hope to be housed and fed, the rich first must get to the bottom of the nature of the challenge. Because if Bill Gates's flunkies hope to fend off a wealth tax on his fortune, they must first pretend to commit to caring. And before they can pretend to commit to caring, they must dive into the deepest depths of their wells of greed and conduct more endless studies to help absolve them of all blame and responsibility.

Gates's new casting call to Hollywood is his foundation's first anti-poverty initiative designed exclusively for the United States. It comes just as Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are ramping up their calls for taxing the wealthy, with the goal being to redistribute the wealth downward. The Gates Foundation's pushing of the narrative that poor people have a reputation problem is in itself a passive-aggressive narrative of poor-shaming. If something must be "combated" then there must be some basis for its actual existence. Right?

Since there are no rules restricting this contest to Hollywood and other media professionals, I suggest that poor people themselves should enter for the chance to win a hundred grand. A homeless person in California might chronicle her daily life on skid row with a borrowed smart phone. A struggling mother on a meager SNAP budget can write about visiting her poorly-stocked local food pantry every month. Somebody else could explain how they cut corners to meet rising rents on Walmart wages. The possibilities are endless.

Stories emphasizing solidarity among people would be even more compelling, such as Chicago teachers and nurses striking and marching right alongside their students and patients. An employee-produced documentary about the horrible working conditions in Amazon fulfillment centers and the resulting burgeoning labor movement would be similarly inspiring.

That way, when the Gates Panel of Experts ultimately awards the grant money for a film about Chelsea Clinton and her books-in-laundromats initiative, or to a heartwarming Joe Biden-inspired documentary about reputation-battered minority parents getting new record players to boost their kids' vocabularies, the poor themselves can cry foul and expose tax-avoiding philanthrocapitalism for what it is: a neoliberal greed racket to keep poor people down and out.

Deadline for entry is eight weeks away, so you'll need to come up with your ideas in a relative hurry so that the Gates Foundation can cut the checks in time for the big Democratic primaries next year.

But let the entrant beware. For buried deep within the Gates's criteria for winning their poverty propaganda funding is this neoliberal gem:
Change from a sole focus on lack of money to money, power, agency, and dignity.
In other words, they will fund only those portrayals of the "respectable" poor for whom the chronic and crushing lack of money is not their most pressing and selfish concern, for whom having enough cash to feed and house themselves and their families is of co-equal importance with such intangibles as identity and self-worth. Bill and Melinda Gates do not want to be parted from any of their own excess wealth. They do, however, want to feel good about themselves and their excess wealth. And they want you to feel good, too. Because through their embrace of the respectable, deserving poor as opposed to the undeserving poor, they can remind all the respectable "non-elites" in their audience that your own plight could always be worse. You might never even enjoy the privilege of seeing a poor person in her native habitat without Bill and Melinda as your anthropological field guides.

They want to discourage mass uprisings of increasing numbers of poor people by pretending to help poor people to help themselves with non-existent but optimistic "ladders of opportunity," along with helping Wall Street to help the poor with digitized financial services. And, of course, lots of Microsoft computers in classrooms in privatized, for-profit, non-unionized charter schools.

They also don't want Bernie Sanders to be president. His latest proposal to fund Medicare For All and other poverty-busting programs would literally cut the obscene Gates fortune right in half. Rival Elizabeth Warren, on the other hand, is only politely asking the tech mogul and his cohort for a mere two cents on the dollar.

7 comments:

  1. Karen Garcia is one of the most important social critics in North America. This particular commentary goes right to the heart of a neoliberal ethic supported by the super rich which seems to think character and public relations are at the heart of systemic poverty and mass suffering caused by casino capitalism or even worse, neoliberal fascism.

    ReplyDelete


  2. The Jay-Ottawa Foundation (JOF) is happy to announce the winner of this year's essay contest on the subject of spotting gross hypocrisy. The essay prize winner is ... ... ... one K. Garcia, whose IP address we've traced to somewhere in southeastern New York State.

    As it happens, she is also the prize winner of our other essay contest, the one for highlighting sources of pleasing and heart-felt non-solutions for grave problems.

    As well as yet another of our prizes, the one for ferreting out disingenuous self-promotion efforts by the damned.

    The JOF believes Ms Garcia's deserving essay deserves wider reading by deserving thought-leaders. So here's the thing: Does anyone know the personal email addresses for Bill and Melinda Gates who were the principal unprincipled perps outed by Garcia's research?

    We must have the real addresses, not the ones that go first to flunkies who will only tag the essay as spam and send it back into the ether, unread, except by NSA's Snowdens of tomorrow. Send me those special addresses, if you know them, and I will personally, on behalf of the JOF, send Garcia's most excellent essay to the two people who've had such a big hand in shaping the world's record-setting disparities.

    Alternatively and much more effectively, if one of you happens to be a clever hacker, please create a double-pronged virus. The virus will first implant this essay on all the boardroom computers of corporate America. Secondly, it will hold up every supercomputer, desktop, tablet and mobile of the top 10% for ransom until they accept legislation to tax every computerized transaction on Wall Street, the billions thereby collected to be redistributed by the ultra transparent JOF itself.

    ReplyDelete

  3. "Among the very rich you will never find a really generous man, even by accident. They may give their money away, but they will never give themselves away; they are egoistic, secretive, dry as old bones. To be smart enough to get all that money you must be dull enough to want it.
    The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all."
    ~ Gilbert Keith Chesterton

    “Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well- warmed, and well-fed.”
    ~ Herman Melville

    “If you're in trouble, or hurt or need - go to the poor people. They're the only ones that'll help - the only ones.”
    ~ John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath

    “If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin.”
    ~ Charles Darwin, Voyage of the Beagle

    “History is written by the rich, and so the poor get blamed for everything.”
    ~ Jeffrey D. Sachs

    “An imbalance between rich and poor is the oldest and most fatal ailment of all republics.”
    ~ Plutarch

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Jay

    Good news! The thought leader of the Onward Together movement wants to know what we're thinking! If you can catch up with Hillary Clinton on her new national Listening Tour, you could read her Karen's essay or hand her a copy. If that fails, she's soon to begin a national book tour with co-author Chelsea for their new book 'The Book of Gutsy Women: Favorite Stories of Courage and Resilience'.

    New Hillary Listening Tour: ‘I’d Like to Hear What You're Thinking’

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/new-hillary-listening-tour-id-like-to-hear-what-your-thinking

    ReplyDelete
  5. Record players at the Sud-Z-Coin.

    ReplyDelete

  6. Twenty years ago (1999) Hillary invented the listening tour and launched it in upstate New York. I was there. She sold herself well and became the junior senator from NY.

    She's been selling herself well, or almost well enough, ever since. This time around, pundits are wondering whether she isn't up to something more than selling a book as November 2020 approaches. Three's a charm, as they say.

    So far only two venues listed by VividSeats for her book tour with Chelsea (the girl with the straightened hair). Tickets in Brooklyn's Kings Theatre now going from a low of $8 to a high of $120. Onward to Portland, OR, later in October with tickets from $280 to $415. Fox News says sales are slow and the prices diving.

    Brooklyn is kinda close, but the Secret Service would never let me in the hall, what with my brilliant record as a heckler.

    Furthermore, a big Canadian election is just around the corner, and I've got my hands full up here blaming Justin for everything that's gone wrong. If the Liberals go down, the Conservatives will go up, meaning no real change over the next five years. But at least the Liberals will have been spanked for talking like progressives and legislating like corporatists. As for the remaining parties, the NDP and the Greens, alas, they are expected to live on as before, gnats on the body politic.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Jay

    I want the kind of political listening tour where the politician is on stage, tied to a chair! Or a post -- Addams Family Thanksgiving!

    As for the ticket prices for Hillary's tour, actually much less than the high-end seat prices for Michelle Obama's tour. Either way, too much. And it's not like either them doesn't already have enough money. But high prices could be a psychological retailing strategy: If they don't charge a high price for their neoliberal sh!t, the purchasers won't value it as they would if paying a substantial price.

    I have no use for either of them.

    ReplyDelete