The federal indictment of Donald Trump and his valet might have a very P.G. Wodehouse feel about it, were it not for one humorless twist. When wealthy Bertie Wooster was accused of a theft, as he was in every single story in the series, his faithful man Jeeves would always come to the rescue. Not in real life, though, given that Trump's own faithful valet has been indicted right along with him. The objective seems to be to pressure Jeeves into turning state's evidence against Bertie.
You didn't think that Trump would haul all those boxes of files into his MAGA-Largo bathroom himself, did you?
If the former president had any sense, as I wrote in a previous post, he would defend his theft of the top-secret documents by claiming that he needed them for research on his memoirs, or at least that he was only storing them prior to the eventual conversion of his mansion into a very serious public presidential library. All he needed to do was to bullshit the National Archives about his pure and scholarly motivations. As it was, he was so oafish that he was caught on tape admitting that he should have declassified the papers while he was still president.
Also - has the man never heard of digitization? Has he never heard of the deficit-defeating Paperwork Reduction Act? How easily could he have spilled precious state secrets to his cronies via his smartphone.
And since the New York Times had once made a big blockbuster story of his penchant for flushing papers down the White House toilet, he might even have pled that he thought the boxed bathroom stash were rolls and rolls of the Angel Soft that he'd hoarded during the Great Pandemic Toilet Paper Panic.
Then again, Trump never thought of himself as the steward of a sovereign nation. In speeches, he very often confused the words "country" and "company." As the CEO, he assumed that his golden parachute would protect him into perpetuity, or at least until such time as he could claw his way back from enforced retirement to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
But back to the indictment, coming so quickly on the heels of the Stormy Daniels court proceeding in New York and the civil liability verdict for libeling and lying about his department store rape victim. It seems obvious that despite its legal merit under the all-purpose Espionage Act. this prosecution right on the very cusp of Decision '24 is politically motivated. The Espionage Act itself was enacted out of pure political paranoia during World War I. It was aimed not so much at the German spies allegedly infiltrating the United States, but against the thousands of American citizens who were critical of Woodrow Wilson's entry into the war. The law's most famous victim was labor leader Eugene Debs, who spent 10 years in jail for very obliquely criticizing US foreign policy in a speech at Madison Square Garden. The very sweeping generalities implicit in the Espionage Act are precisely why it remains enshrined in law right up to the present time. The neocon, neoliberal thugs of the permanent ruling order are using the judicial system to force Trump out of the presidential race, whether he does it willingly or not. There's a reason they're going after him on document theft rather than for instigating an electoral coup. Indicting Trump for the January 6 riot, or insurrection, or whatever you want to call it would implicate the entire ruling order itself, including the military establishment which sat on its heels for hours as the mob roamed the capitol in, let's be honest, a rather lackadaisical manner.
Trump might even be considered a sympathetic victim were it not for the fact that he himself had embraced the Espionage Act in the indictment of Wikileaks' Julian Assange. So no, we shouldn't feel sorry for him at all. This is a guy who can't even assemble a new team of lawyers let alone score a butler who's smarter than he is.
To the great disappointment of the New York Times, his fans didn't even follow through with the dire expert forecasts of violent riots in front of the Miami courthouse once he was booked and fingerprinted. The arrest of Trump sadly didn't segue into a full-scale fascist revolution, which would have justified even more surveillance and targeting of regular people.
As the Gray Lady ruefully reported,
Twice in recent months, allies of former President Donald J. Trump have used violent language to criticize the criminal charges brought against him, calling for vengeance and encouraging Mr. Trump’s supporters to respond to the indictments as though they were acts of war.
Both times — first in April in Manhattan and then on Tuesday in Miami — police and civic leaders raised concerns that the angry rhetoric could lead to violent protests when Mr. Trump appeared in court. Both times, in both cities, the crowds that actually showed up for Mr. Trump were relatively tame and fairly small.
These regular people who've shockingly taken to using speech as a deadly weapon and a threat to the ruling order not only include Trump supporters, they include challengers to the Democratic Party from the left, including Cornel West and, to a lesser extent, Robert Kennedy Jr. Why else would the centrists of establishment media and the duopoly always make a point of falsely accusing the left of forging unholy alliances with the right? It's really bottom-up resistance that they fear and despise, and which they cynically accuse of being "violent."
Speech itself (First Amendment be damned) is under attack by a new breed of reactionary, repressive liberal. Their more frequent use of the term "violent speech" is ominous because it implies that words themselves might end up getting criminalized. This is, after all, exactly how the grotesquely still-extant Espionage Act was first used against dissidents and critics more than a century ago.
