In case you missed this.... here is some unedited raw footage from the Sarah Palin Boo-Fest in Madison on Sunday. The guy doing the intro is conservative provocateur Andrew Breitbart, the heckuva guy who brought down ACORN and got Van Jones and Shirley Sherrod fired.
It was one of the few heavily attended "Tax Day" events in capital cities -- and that is only because the crowd was composed largely of pro-union demonstrators and but a handful of Tea Partiers.
The video was sent to me by my friend "pvolkov", whose two comments today on Paul Krugman's column perfectly summarized the Madison spectacle. "One could not make out what she was trying to say", Ms. Volkov relates," but the screeching of her voice was like chalk on a blackboard. The intensity of the crowd's response was electrifying."
As she noted, you didn't see this footage on your TV news. And if you did, it was heavily edited to amplify Palin's inhuman octave levels and to muffle, if not drown out entirely, the sights and sounds of the protesters. CNN went so far as to claim Palin really fired up the crowd! I am convinced the only reason Palin kept speaking was because her contract stipulated "no finish, no paycheck".
The event was sponsored (naturally) by the Koch Brothers' "Americans for Prosperity" teabagger front group. The mainstream media continues to cover the ever more sparsely attended Tea Party "events" as if it were really still a grassroots movement, and continues to ignore the truly massive protests of progressives occurring nationwide. I guess the TV cable and corporate print media types live in the same bubble as the politicians. But whether they like it or not, they're going to lose control of the narrative sooner rather than later. The true progressive movement is under the control of no party. The Democrats have given nary a nod to the demonstrations. It's as conservative David Frum says: while the GOP fears its own dwindling base, the Democrats seem to despise theirs.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d28JrsE8YyI&feature=player_detailpage
Monday, April 18, 2011
Sunday, April 17, 2011
Paul Ryan Shrugged
It's a DoubleStuff version of a Cheez Whiz oreo. Ayn Rand and Paul Ryan, the Brangelina of nihilistic free market capitalism, are both having career surges this weekend -- she with a movie premiere and he with another gala performance of "Killing Medicare" on the Sunday morning talk show circuit. So what if one of them is physically dead, and the other is an intellectual flat-liner? Where there's greed, there's life.... and it goes on and on and on, with the avarice and mendacity chromosomes of the gene pool being carried forward in many a self-interested body.
And now Paul Ryan is taking up the Rand baton of the free market and the evils of big government. A mere lad of 12 when his dominatrix died, he nevertheless fell under her spell and has never looked back. He even makes his staff read her novels as though they were the conservative gospel.
"That Paul Ryan thinks 'Atlas Shrugged' is worth reading (and wasting staff time on) tells you all you need to know about him. He is a non-intellectual lightweight who thinks Ayn Rand's dreadful, fascistic romance novel makes for a good lesson in social engineering and economics," wrote Marie Burns of RealityChex today in response to a Maureen Dowd column that simultaneously shilled and dissed yet another movie premiere.
Atlas Shrugged, so Maureen plugged. Instead of a grade C remake, I would rather see a movie on Rand herself, something more realistic than that soft porn straight-to-cable biopic starring Helen Mirren more than a decade ago. If Mirren could play the Queen, she could also play the cold, emotionless Ayn Rand. She could repeat Rand's testimony before the House UnAmerican Affairs committee on the "red menace" in Hollywood in the 50s. Another pivotal scene might be of her famous "Philosophy: Who Needs It?" George Patton-like speech in 1974 to an audience of young West Point cadets. Although it is likely that future General David Petraeus was in the house and met her, that has never been confirmed. But it's only a movie -- and our current government is Kabuki play-acting, anyway, and the military already calls battlefields and campaigns "theatres."
Parts of the speech, which included her assertion that the Military Industrial Complex is just a myth, were later included in the philosophy curriculum of USMA. Here's a choice tidbit she spouted during the Q & A with the cadets: "Any white person who brought the element of civilization had the right to take over this continent." (or for that matter, any other continent, from Asia to Africa and beyond). So she was a not-so closeted racist too, which also fits the bill to be a card-carrying right wing ideologue. Only now, racism is disguised as birtherism. And not so disguised, as in Donald Trump's recent boast that he gets along just fine with "the blacks."
The end of the film (I hereby nominate the Coen Brothers to be writers/directors) would depict Ayn sneakily applying for Medicare and Social Security toward the end of her life, when her chain-smoking habit finally caught up with her and she got lung cancer. I can just picture Mirren haughtily rasping, "I took government welfare only because it was in my own self-interest to do so," before the fade to black. There might also be a scene of young Paul Ryan getting his Social Security survivors' benefits when his father died, also purely out of individualistic selfishness. He certainly didn't need to suck on any of the teats of Alan Simpson's government milk cow, because he inherited a multimillion dollar business. But Social Security isn't means-tested -- though grown-up Ryan would certainly love to change that now.
Of course, Ryan and Greenspan aren't the only Rand Fans. The real Brangelina are apparently true believers. So is Vince Vaughn. Maybe Dowd could write about them next time. Of course, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck are in the fold. And CNBC star Rick Santelli, whose on-air rant famously birthed the Tea Party Movement as a means of deflecting blame for the mortgage meltdown from Wall Street to Reaganesque welfare queens, is also a self-avowed Randroid.
Screeched Santelli on the floor of the Chicago Stock Exchange in 2009: "Why don't you put up a website to have people vote on the Internet as a referendum to see if we really want to subsidize the losers' mortgages, or would we like to at least buy cars and buy houses in foreclosure and give them to people that might have a chance to actually prosper down the road and reward people that could carry the water instead of drink the water!"
He later admitted, "I know this may not sound very humanitarian, but at the end of the day I'm an Ayn Rand-er." Curiously, despite being an avowed atheist, Ayn Rand is everywhere in right-wing world. Her novels are enjoying a huge boost in sales. The Rapture goes secular.
"For over half a century," writes Jennifer (no relation to Marie) Burns in her new biography, "Rand has been the ultimate gateway drug to life on the right."
 |
| Star-Crossed Love Object(ivists) |
Some people I know had a brief fling with the soap opera fiction of Ayn Rand during adolescence, since her novels seem to satisfy the deep-seated (mainly male) teenage urge to be the center of the universe, have lots of overblown sex, or just be left alone to do their own thing. Most people do shake off adolescent fads and the rigid thinking of youthful cults and well,... just grow out of it. But some don't, and Ayn Randism is nothing if not a cult. Perhaps the most egregious example of someone never outgrowing Rand's juvenile philosophy of selfishness is former Fed Chairman Al Greenspan. To make matters even worse, he actually knew the woman in the flesh and was a member of her inner circle of acolytes. Greenspan is a True Believer in the sanctity of an unregulated free market. The financial world crashed because of his misguided faith. And no, he has never been indicted or even criticized all that much by the mainstream media. It doesn't hurt that he's also married to an msm star (Andrea Mitchell).
"That Paul Ryan thinks 'Atlas Shrugged' is worth reading (and wasting staff time on) tells you all you need to know about him. He is a non-intellectual lightweight who thinks Ayn Rand's dreadful, fascistic romance novel makes for a good lesson in social engineering and economics," wrote Marie Burns of RealityChex today in response to a Maureen Dowd column that simultaneously shilled and dissed yet another movie premiere.
Atlas Shrugged, so Maureen plugged. Instead of a grade C remake, I would rather see a movie on Rand herself, something more realistic than that soft porn straight-to-cable biopic starring Helen Mirren more than a decade ago. If Mirren could play the Queen, she could also play the cold, emotionless Ayn Rand. She could repeat Rand's testimony before the House UnAmerican Affairs committee on the "red menace" in Hollywood in the 50s. Another pivotal scene might be of her famous "Philosophy: Who Needs It?" George Patton-like speech in 1974 to an audience of young West Point cadets. Although it is likely that future General David Petraeus was in the house and met her, that has never been confirmed. But it's only a movie -- and our current government is Kabuki play-acting, anyway, and the military already calls battlefields and campaigns "theatres."
Parts of the speech, which included her assertion that the Military Industrial Complex is just a myth, were later included in the philosophy curriculum of USMA. Here's a choice tidbit she spouted during the Q & A with the cadets: "Any white person who brought the element of civilization had the right to take over this continent." (or for that matter, any other continent, from Asia to Africa and beyond). So she was a not-so closeted racist too, which also fits the bill to be a card-carrying right wing ideologue. Only now, racism is disguised as birtherism. And not so disguised, as in Donald Trump's recent boast that he gets along just fine with "the blacks."
The end of the film (I hereby nominate the Coen Brothers to be writers/directors) would depict Ayn sneakily applying for Medicare and Social Security toward the end of her life, when her chain-smoking habit finally caught up with her and she got lung cancer. I can just picture Mirren haughtily rasping, "I took government welfare only because it was in my own self-interest to do so," before the fade to black. There might also be a scene of young Paul Ryan getting his Social Security survivors' benefits when his father died, also purely out of individualistic selfishness. He certainly didn't need to suck on any of the teats of Alan Simpson's government milk cow, because he inherited a multimillion dollar business. But Social Security isn't means-tested -- though grown-up Ryan would certainly love to change that now.
Of course, Ryan and Greenspan aren't the only Rand Fans. The real Brangelina are apparently true believers. So is Vince Vaughn. Maybe Dowd could write about them next time. Of course, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck are in the fold. And CNBC star Rick Santelli, whose on-air rant famously birthed the Tea Party Movement as a means of deflecting blame for the mortgage meltdown from Wall Street to Reaganesque welfare queens, is also a self-avowed Randroid.
Screeched Santelli on the floor of the Chicago Stock Exchange in 2009: "Why don't you put up a website to have people vote on the Internet as a referendum to see if we really want to subsidize the losers' mortgages, or would we like to at least buy cars and buy houses in foreclosure and give them to people that might have a chance to actually prosper down the road and reward people that could carry the water instead of drink the water!"
He later admitted, "I know this may not sound very humanitarian, but at the end of the day I'm an Ayn Rand-er." Curiously, despite being an avowed atheist, Ayn Rand is everywhere in right-wing world. Her novels are enjoying a huge boost in sales. The Rapture goes secular.
"For over half a century," writes Jennifer (no relation to Marie) Burns in her new biography, "Rand has been the ultimate gateway drug to life on the right."
Oh, and here's a scoop, in case you missed it in my Times comment. The TARP program, which bailed out the banksters, really stands for The Ayn Rand Program for troubled capitalists. They just never got around to telling us.
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Bankers and Other Protected Species
It's official. Gray wolves in Idaho and Montana are now fair game for Sarah Palin and other hunters. Today's congressional budget vote contained the first ever Congressional rider removing an animal from the endangered species list. Only problem is, the politicians forgot to remove another breed of predator from the protected list: the Wall Street banker.
Several recent reports, in The New York Times and elsewhere, have reminded us that not one of the bankers who caused the meltdown two years ago, destroying the savings and the lives of countless Americans and doing their part to make illegal foreclosures and 20 percent unemployment the new normal, has been indicted or gone to jail. Not a single one.
In her Times story today, Gretchen Morgenson recounted a meeting in 2008 between Treasury Secretary nominee Timothy Geithner and then-N.Y. Attorney General (now governor) Andrew Cuomo. They conveniently decided not to prosecute either banks or bankers for fear of ruining the markets and causing financial Armageddon. Now, where have we heard that scary term before? Oh yeah, from the boss of JP Morgan Chase, whose profits just soared by 67 percent. CEO Jamie Dimon personally went to the U.S. government last week to warn of yet another Armageddon, in the event Congress does not raise the debt ceiling next month. That's the same Jamie Dimon who charged his company a whopping half a mil in moving expenses recently because his million dollar salary and $5 million bonus just didn't cut it. I guess he wants to fly a private space shuttle to Mars to avoid Armageddon when the debt ceiling collapse explodes the whole planet. Either that, or he's going to move the contents of Fort Knox to an underground mansion paid for by Homeland Security. (You can probably tell I am really into conspiracy theories today as well as feeling crankier than usual).
Morgenson also blamed the lack of FBI expertise and manpower for the failure to investigate Wall Street bankers. She contrasted the current lack of accountability to the hundreds of prosecutions in the Savings & Loan scandals in the 90s, when the modern day Mr. Potters actually went to the slammer. Not only do few investigators have the knowledge of the arcane credit default swaps and other financial casino tricks invented by Wall Street, the culprits themselves have trouble explaining exactly what they did to screw us all so royally. They committed crimes so novel there were no specific laws against them. The Securities and Exchange Commission in charge of overseeing the financial world was lackadaisical at best and criminally complicit at worst. Whisteblowers who approached Congress were ignored. The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, enacted during the Great Depression to prevent the rise of banks too big to fail, just opened the floodgates of unfettered greed even wider. Gene Sperling, a top Obama economic advisor, was one of the architects of that repeal during the Clinton Administration. The so-called financial reform legislation last year co-sponsored by Chris Dodd (himself a beneficiary of a crooked Countrywide mortgage deal) and smooth talking Barney Frank, has teeth made of yellow jello.
But the real wolves have been reined in, proving that Congress, despite the conventional wisdom, can really do things when it takes a mind too. The wolf population has grown and no longer in danger of extinction. They apparently have been killing livestock and terrorizing Max Baucus's constituents. And the National Rifle Association has to have more furry warm bodies as targets for their bullets of freedom.
RootsAction, a group of activist economists, is calling for A Robin Hood tax on Wall Street Let's see if the president puts his money where his mouth is and fights for it. Cuomo , himself a puppet of Wall Street, just got rid of the state millionaires tax and slashed the budget on the backs of the poor. The banks threatened to leave Wall Street unless he did. The corporations and banks are so grateful they are running nonstop TV ads thanking him. They're calling themselves the Committee to Save New York, and their ad actually features a crowd of pedestrians in Brooks Brothers suits. I am not kidding! No wonder the banksters are raking in the record profits. Even their needy trophy wives get sweetheart zero interest deals from The Fed, according to a recent article by Matt Taibbi in Rolling Stone. (And for a detailed story on Cuomo's influence peddlers, see "Eyes on the Ties" on my Blog List on the right- hand side of the page).
But it's never enough. Jamie Dimon is now whining that Senator Dick Durbin wants to put the kibosh on his usurious price-fixing debit card fees. This guy is insatiable. His greed goes way beyond normal unmitigated avarice. Since he and his ilk are already de facto owners of the government, any attempt to rein him in amounts to a mutiny, in his view. It is sheer effrontery for Uncle Sam to say no to Mr. Dimon.
Meanwhile, I hope all the gray wolves somehow get word that the bullets are going to be flying and do the smart thing by emigrating to Canada. The laws up there actually protect species, both human and animal. And they even have strict banking laws that protect ordinary citizens. I say let's ship Jamie Dimon up there to the wastes of the Yukon Territory or an abandoned Siberian gulag and let him howl all he wants at the moon, alone and far away, where he and other seriously dangerous creatures can cause no further damage. The taxpayers will gladly foot the bill for his moving expenses.
Several recent reports, in The New York Times and elsewhere, have reminded us that not one of the bankers who caused the meltdown two years ago, destroying the savings and the lives of countless Americans and doing their part to make illegal foreclosures and 20 percent unemployment the new normal, has been indicted or gone to jail. Not a single one.
In her Times story today, Gretchen Morgenson recounted a meeting in 2008 between Treasury Secretary nominee Timothy Geithner and then-N.Y. Attorney General (now governor) Andrew Cuomo. They conveniently decided not to prosecute either banks or bankers for fear of ruining the markets and causing financial Armageddon. Now, where have we heard that scary term before? Oh yeah, from the boss of JP Morgan Chase, whose profits just soared by 67 percent. CEO Jamie Dimon personally went to the U.S. government last week to warn of yet another Armageddon, in the event Congress does not raise the debt ceiling next month. That's the same Jamie Dimon who charged his company a whopping half a mil in moving expenses recently because his million dollar salary and $5 million bonus just didn't cut it. I guess he wants to fly a private space shuttle to Mars to avoid Armageddon when the debt ceiling collapse explodes the whole planet. Either that, or he's going to move the contents of Fort Knox to an underground mansion paid for by Homeland Security. (You can probably tell I am really into conspiracy theories today as well as feeling crankier than usual).
Morgenson also blamed the lack of FBI expertise and manpower for the failure to investigate Wall Street bankers. She contrasted the current lack of accountability to the hundreds of prosecutions in the Savings & Loan scandals in the 90s, when the modern day Mr. Potters actually went to the slammer. Not only do few investigators have the knowledge of the arcane credit default swaps and other financial casino tricks invented by Wall Street, the culprits themselves have trouble explaining exactly what they did to screw us all so royally. They committed crimes so novel there were no specific laws against them. The Securities and Exchange Commission in charge of overseeing the financial world was lackadaisical at best and criminally complicit at worst. Whisteblowers who approached Congress were ignored. The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, enacted during the Great Depression to prevent the rise of banks too big to fail, just opened the floodgates of unfettered greed even wider. Gene Sperling, a top Obama economic advisor, was one of the architects of that repeal during the Clinton Administration. The so-called financial reform legislation last year co-sponsored by Chris Dodd (himself a beneficiary of a crooked Countrywide mortgage deal) and smooth talking Barney Frank, has teeth made of yellow jello.
But the real wolves have been reined in, proving that Congress, despite the conventional wisdom, can really do things when it takes a mind too. The wolf population has grown and no longer in danger of extinction. They apparently have been killing livestock and terrorizing Max Baucus's constituents. And the National Rifle Association has to have more furry warm bodies as targets for their bullets of freedom.
RootsAction, a group of activist economists, is calling for A Robin Hood tax on Wall Street Let's see if the president puts his money where his mouth is and fights for it. Cuomo , himself a puppet of Wall Street, just got rid of the state millionaires tax and slashed the budget on the backs of the poor. The banks threatened to leave Wall Street unless he did. The corporations and banks are so grateful they are running nonstop TV ads thanking him. They're calling themselves the Committee to Save New York, and their ad actually features a crowd of pedestrians in Brooks Brothers suits. I am not kidding! No wonder the banksters are raking in the record profits. Even their needy trophy wives get sweetheart zero interest deals from The Fed, according to a recent article by Matt Taibbi in Rolling Stone. (And for a detailed story on Cuomo's influence peddlers, see "Eyes on the Ties" on my Blog List on the right- hand side of the page).
But it's never enough. Jamie Dimon is now whining that Senator Dick Durbin wants to put the kibosh on his usurious price-fixing debit card fees. This guy is insatiable. His greed goes way beyond normal unmitigated avarice. Since he and his ilk are already de facto owners of the government, any attempt to rein him in amounts to a mutiny, in his view. It is sheer effrontery for Uncle Sam to say no to Mr. Dimon.
Meanwhile, I hope all the gray wolves somehow get word that the bullets are going to be flying and do the smart thing by emigrating to Canada. The laws up there actually protect species, both human and animal. And they even have strict banking laws that protect ordinary citizens. I say let's ship Jamie Dimon up there to the wastes of the Yukon Territory or an abandoned Siberian gulag and let him howl all he wants at the moon, alone and far away, where he and other seriously dangerous creatures can cause no further damage. The taxpayers will gladly foot the bill for his moving expenses.
 |
| Let's Give Them a Reason to Howl |
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Taking the Centrist Obama Cult Pledge
Now that we are recovering from our paroxysms of ecstasy from listening to President Obama's speech this afternoon, and the afterglow is being replaced (for at least a few of us) with that old cynical morning-after feeling, the Reelection Campaign is wasting no time in reining in the base. I just got this odd email from Obama operative and base-hater Jim Messina:
I am being asked to sign a pledge or oath of some kind. I hereby promise to be a crusading centrist/compassionate Republican-lite. Umm.... I don't think so. Just yesterday, I signed that progressive petition telling Obama he could fuggedabout me voting for him, working for him and sending him any more of my dollars. I even asked him to return the fifty bucks I sent him two years ago because I have to pay my electric bill. I guess he didn't get the message yet.
These people think a wonderful speech changes everything and we will all just swoon at his feet again when he graces us with that million-dollar smile. How do you spell c-l-u-e-l-e-s-s? On second thought, I am probably in the minority. Based on what I am hearing. liberals are celebrating Obama's return to liberal principles. Fool me once, fool me twice, fool me a hundred times. But ask yourselves this. Where, in the speech, did Obama talk about jobs, jobs, jobs? How many times did he utter that corporatist mantra "winning the future?"
Make no mistake. This was a typical, persuasive Obama campaign speech. It was not a presidential policy speech. It made a lot of us feel good, have renewed hope. But, like Glenn Greenwald, I have long given up paying attention to the speeches. Just keep an eye on what Obama actually does.
We were all being set up for a disappointing capitulation, but surprise! He will defend Medicare and Social Security! (no mention of Medicaid. Uh oh). Therefore, we should all be grateful he didn't fall into Paul Ryan's arms in a bipartisan embrace. Think about this in terms of political theater. Paul Ryan is the bad cop, the evil character, and whether he knows it or not, the fall guy of the season. Barack Obama is the good cop and the savior who says he will refuse to extend the Bush tax cuts again. But that's not for another two years. Notice that he is not specifically backing Illinois Rep. Jan Schakowsky's Fairness in Taxation Act, calling for an immediate tax hike on millionaires and billionaires? Of course, he will take Ryan on -- Ryan is easy to take on, because he is extreme beyond all rationality. His own party won't back him once push comes to shove.
Jim Messina, a protege of Montana Senator Max Baucus, is a former White House deputy chief of staff whose job was to have weekly meetings with progressive groups to make sure their independent grassroots efforts on health care reform jibed with the Administration's. He clashed with several progressives over the secret deal with the pharmaceutical industry to back away from reimportation of drugs from Canada. Read the excellent article by Ari Berman in The Nation to get the full background on Messina, who has been called Obama's Karl Rove.
Stand by the President's Vision
President Obama has called for a plan that ensures we can live within our means while still investing in our future. I stand by his vision to:- Rein in the deficit while protecting seniors and the middle class, and making the investments we need to win the future;
- Ensure that the most vulnerable Americans are not the only ones sharing the burden of fiscal responsibility;
- Keep spending low while strengthening Medicare and Medicaid, and end trillions in tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires who don't need them; and
- Set aside partisanship in favor of a renewed sense of shared responsibility and shared sacrifice.
I am being asked to sign a pledge or oath of some kind. I hereby promise to be a crusading centrist/compassionate Republican-lite. Umm.... I don't think so. Just yesterday, I signed that progressive petition telling Obama he could fuggedabout me voting for him, working for him and sending him any more of my dollars. I even asked him to return the fifty bucks I sent him two years ago because I have to pay my electric bill. I guess he didn't get the message yet.
These people think a wonderful speech changes everything and we will all just swoon at his feet again when he graces us with that million-dollar smile. How do you spell c-l-u-e-l-e-s-s? On second thought, I am probably in the minority. Based on what I am hearing. liberals are celebrating Obama's return to liberal principles. Fool me once, fool me twice, fool me a hundred times. But ask yourselves this. Where, in the speech, did Obama talk about jobs, jobs, jobs? How many times did he utter that corporatist mantra "winning the future?"
Make no mistake. This was a typical, persuasive Obama campaign speech. It was not a presidential policy speech. It made a lot of us feel good, have renewed hope. But, like Glenn Greenwald, I have long given up paying attention to the speeches. Just keep an eye on what Obama actually does.
We were all being set up for a disappointing capitulation, but surprise! He will defend Medicare and Social Security! (no mention of Medicaid. Uh oh). Therefore, we should all be grateful he didn't fall into Paul Ryan's arms in a bipartisan embrace. Think about this in terms of political theater. Paul Ryan is the bad cop, the evil character, and whether he knows it or not, the fall guy of the season. Barack Obama is the good cop and the savior who says he will refuse to extend the Bush tax cuts again. But that's not for another two years. Notice that he is not specifically backing Illinois Rep. Jan Schakowsky's Fairness in Taxation Act, calling for an immediate tax hike on millionaires and billionaires? Of course, he will take Ryan on -- Ryan is easy to take on, because he is extreme beyond all rationality. His own party won't back him once push comes to shove.
 |
| I Wantcha Back in My Personality Cult |
Jim Messina, a protege of Montana Senator Max Baucus, is a former White House deputy chief of staff whose job was to have weekly meetings with progressive groups to make sure their independent grassroots efforts on health care reform jibed with the Administration's. He clashed with several progressives over the secret deal with the pharmaceutical industry to back away from reimportation of drugs from Canada. Read the excellent article by Ari Berman in The Nation to get the full background on Messina, who has been called Obama's Karl Rove.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Theaters of War at the White House
As a group protesting military spending put on a puppet show on the White House steps today to show how money spent on war could be better used to create jobs, fight poverty and fund education, some living breathing puppets were inside the People's House* to put on a show of support for military families.
A Military-Industrial Complex policy group creepily called the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) is funding Michelle Obama's signature initiative, called "Joining Forces." And joining her today to head the team was fired and formerly disgraced Afghanistan General Stanley McChrystal, now embarking on a political version of the Celebrity Rehab Tour in an unpaid (directly) gig to ostensibly lend support to our abused and overused troops. However, according to an article by Nathan Hodge in The Nation last month called "Coalition of the Shilling", the core purpose of CNAS is anything but altruistic. Founded in 2007 by a group of centrist Democrats, defense contractors and retired military brass, its sole purpose is to keep the wars going and the profits flowing to the MIC. One of its trustees is the former CEO of Lockheed Martin, which profits mightily from its military hardware and fighter jet sales - both domestically and to foreign armies.
Hodge writes, "Two former Clinton administration officials, Michèle Flournoy and Kurt Campbell, founded CNAS in 2007 as a way for centrist Democrats to reclaim a place in the national security debate ahead of the 2008 presidential race. It was an expert triangulation: Flournoy, Campbell and their associates staked out a hawkish (or, as they would term it, a “pragmatic and principled”) position on Iraq, opposing early deadlines for withdrawal. After Obama’s election, CNAS would emerge as a key feeder for the new administration’s national security team. No fewer than fourteen CNAS grads would land slots in the Defense and State departments. Flournoy now occupies the number-three post at the Pentagon, and Campbell is the head of the State Department’s Asia bureau.
"How exactly did Flournoy and Campbell conjure up a think tank out of thin air? In addition to support from foundations like the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the Ploughshares Foundation, CNAS received heavy backing from the military industry. Its list of donors includes major weapons manufacturers like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Raytheon and BAE Systems. It also receives contributions from private security firms like Aegis Defence Services, as well as from KBR, the logistics support contractor notorious for overbilling the Pentagon for its services in Iraq and Afghanistan. And it generates income from research contracts with the Pentagon and intelligence agencies, as do others like the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments."
As military families are struggling to get by on their relatively meager paychecks, defense contractors are getting obscenely rich on weapons systems and military hardware. And as the troops struggle through tour after exhausting tour in Iraq and Afghanistan, with no end in sight, the White House is utilizing the warm and smiling Michelle Obama as the face of a ramped-up PR campaign of showing the troops our love (and also to make us feel kind of bad for bitching about our own petty problems?) Keep drumming it in: they are sacrificing and getting killed to keep "us" all safe. Would that it were true and they were not just being used as warm expendable flesh to enrich a few wealthy corporations and defense contractors.
(A sidenote - one of the original alleged participants in the White House project to improve the health of the troops was a former Gitmo psychologist who oversaw the "enhanced interrogations" of prisoners. He was disinvited by the First Lady's staff after Glenn Greenwald wrote an expose on his self-proclaimed participation).
Meanwhile, the Institute for Policy Studies, a progressive activist think tank in Washington DC, was one of the sponsors for today's lunchtime event on the White House steps to mark the first Global Day of Action on Military Spending. (GDAMS - love the acronym). This protest, along with hundreds of other demonstrations nationwide and worldwide, comes one day after the release of the 2010 figures for global military expenditures by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. In 2009, the world spent more than $1.5 trillion on the military. Even in the middle of a global economic crisis, military spending has increased, with the United States responsible for nearly half of all such expenditures, worldwide. As IPS director John Feffer explains, what the American defense industry doesn't make for our own wars it gladly sells overseas -- to our allies and enemies alike. A dollar is a dollar, despite what any treaties might stipulate.
The noontime White House protest featured poetry, puppets, and graphic representations of military spending. Representatives of national and local peace and human needs organizations presented "flash facts" to demonstrate how the money spent on defense could be used for other things, such as education, jobs and anti-poverty programs.
We don't know if Barack and Michelle Obama,or Joe and Jill Biden,or Stanley McChrystal,or the CNAS crowd looked out the window at the protesters in a break from their own military love-in, lunch and photo ops, or had any thoughts or comments on the bloated defense budget. Nothing was said about our brave men and women in uniform coming home, permanently. We do know that the President smiled a lot and Michelle hugged everybody. And Michelle made the big announcement that military family members who work at Walmart will get transferred to another Walmart store if their spouses are transferred. Yippee. Way to go, Walmart! Hire American and support our troops, but sell Chinese! And Goodwill promised to hire military families to help sell used clothing to other poor people! And the U.S. Chamber of Commerce will hold military family job fairs. Fairs, mind you -- no jobs quite yet, all that trickle-down from their record profits and tax breaks hasn't quite reached down that far. But it'll be fun, and maybe now Obama won't pick on them and their anonymous political donations so much.
We also don't know if Mary Tillman, who tried and failed to have McChrystal held accountable for the cover-up of her son Pat's death by friendly fire, had any reaction to his big White House comeback as a caring father figure of the troops. She was not included on today's guest list. Nor was Anti-War Mom in Chief Cindy Sheehan -- who should maybe think about setting up a new campsite on the White House lawn as a refreshing change from Bush's ranch.
There is now every sign that all those supposedly noncombat troops in Iraq will be on permanent assignment. And especially now that the U.S. is being kicked out of Pakistan after the CIA murder scandal and the collaterally damaging drone attacks, Afghanistan is not only the longest war in U.S. History, it's aiming to be one of the longest in world history, too. There is money to be made, weapons to be manufactured to boost theeconomy Military Industrial Complex, political offices to win, billions of dollars worth of minerals in those mountains, poppy fields to keep populations anesthetized and cartels in the black, private security firms to profiteer.
Is it any coincidence that the 2012 Democratic National Convention is being held a stone's throw from Fort Bragg, North Carolina? This is one war-loving Administration with one hell of an ironic Nobel Peace Prize winner.
* Update/Correction 4/13 -- Since writing this post, I learned that the "Joining Forces" Obama event was actually held in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, not the White House as originally announced. I apologize for the error -- and will add that it now seems obvious the officials could not and did not see the demonstrations.
Update II 4/14: Mary Tillman has told Jake Tapper of ABC that she is outraged at McChrystal's appointment, and she thinks it makes Obama look "silly."
"I’ve come to learn through this journey that there are many other families that have been lied to by the military about their sons and daughters and so we feel that what happen to Pat is pertains to other people, not just us. I think it’s a slap in the face to all soldiers to appoint this man, to be on this committee," she said.
Amir Bar-Lev, the director of the critically-acclaimed documentary "The Tillman Story" was nothing if not blunt: “Putting Stanley McChrystal in charge of a commission on military families is a little like putting Bernie Madoff in charge of a commission on pensions," he told Tapper.
A Military-Industrial Complex policy group creepily called the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) is funding Michelle Obama's signature initiative, called "Joining Forces." And joining her today to head the team was fired and formerly disgraced Afghanistan General Stanley McChrystal, now embarking on a political version of the Celebrity Rehab Tour in an unpaid (directly) gig to ostensibly lend support to our abused and overused troops. However, according to an article by Nathan Hodge in The Nation last month called "Coalition of the Shilling", the core purpose of CNAS is anything but altruistic. Founded in 2007 by a group of centrist Democrats, defense contractors and retired military brass, its sole purpose is to keep the wars going and the profits flowing to the MIC. One of its trustees is the former CEO of Lockheed Martin, which profits mightily from its military hardware and fighter jet sales - both domestically and to foreign armies.
Hodge writes, "Two former Clinton administration officials, Michèle Flournoy and Kurt Campbell, founded CNAS in 2007 as a way for centrist Democrats to reclaim a place in the national security debate ahead of the 2008 presidential race. It was an expert triangulation: Flournoy, Campbell and their associates staked out a hawkish (or, as they would term it, a “pragmatic and principled”) position on Iraq, opposing early deadlines for withdrawal. After Obama’s election, CNAS would emerge as a key feeder for the new administration’s national security team. No fewer than fourteen CNAS grads would land slots in the Defense and State departments. Flournoy now occupies the number-three post at the Pentagon, and Campbell is the head of the State Department’s Asia bureau.
"How exactly did Flournoy and Campbell conjure up a think tank out of thin air? In addition to support from foundations like the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the Ploughshares Foundation, CNAS received heavy backing from the military industry. Its list of donors includes major weapons manufacturers like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Raytheon and BAE Systems. It also receives contributions from private security firms like Aegis Defence Services, as well as from KBR, the logistics support contractor notorious for overbilling the Pentagon for its services in Iraq and Afghanistan. And it generates income from research contracts with the Pentagon and intelligence agencies, as do others like the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments."
As military families are struggling to get by on their relatively meager paychecks, defense contractors are getting obscenely rich on weapons systems and military hardware. And as the troops struggle through tour after exhausting tour in Iraq and Afghanistan, with no end in sight, the White House is utilizing the warm and smiling Michelle Obama as the face of a ramped-up PR campaign of showing the troops our love (and also to make us feel kind of bad for bitching about our own petty problems?) Keep drumming it in: they are sacrificing and getting killed to keep "us" all safe. Would that it were true and they were not just being used as warm expendable flesh to enrich a few wealthy corporations and defense contractors.
(A sidenote - one of the original alleged participants in the White House project to improve the health of the troops was a former Gitmo psychologist who oversaw the "enhanced interrogations" of prisoners. He was disinvited by the First Lady's staff after Glenn Greenwald wrote an expose on his self-proclaimed participation).
Meanwhile, the Institute for Policy Studies, a progressive activist think tank in Washington DC, was one of the sponsors for today's lunchtime event on the White House steps to mark the first Global Day of Action on Military Spending. (GDAMS - love the acronym). This protest, along with hundreds of other demonstrations nationwide and worldwide, comes one day after the release of the 2010 figures for global military expenditures by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. In 2009, the world spent more than $1.5 trillion on the military. Even in the middle of a global economic crisis, military spending has increased, with the United States responsible for nearly half of all such expenditures, worldwide. As IPS director John Feffer explains, what the American defense industry doesn't make for our own wars it gladly sells overseas -- to our allies and enemies alike. A dollar is a dollar, despite what any treaties might stipulate.
The noontime White House protest featured poetry, puppets, and graphic representations of military spending. Representatives of national and local peace and human needs organizations presented "flash facts" to demonstrate how the money spent on defense could be used for other things, such as education, jobs and anti-poverty programs.
We also don't know if Mary Tillman, who tried and failed to have McChrystal held accountable for the cover-up of her son Pat's death by friendly fire, had any reaction to his big White House comeback as a caring father figure of the troops. She was not included on today's guest list. Nor was Anti-War Mom in Chief Cindy Sheehan -- who should maybe think about setting up a new campsite on the White House lawn as a refreshing change from Bush's ranch.
There is now every sign that all those supposedly noncombat troops in Iraq will be on permanent assignment. And especially now that the U.S. is being kicked out of Pakistan after the CIA murder scandal and the collaterally damaging drone attacks, Afghanistan is not only the longest war in U.S. History, it's aiming to be one of the longest in world history, too. There is money to be made, weapons to be manufactured to boost the
 |
| Les Screwed-Up Priorities |
* Update/Correction 4/13 -- Since writing this post, I learned that the "Joining Forces" Obama event was actually held in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, not the White House as originally announced. I apologize for the error -- and will add that it now seems obvious the officials could not and did not see the demonstrations.
Update II 4/14: Mary Tillman has told Jake Tapper of ABC that she is outraged at McChrystal's appointment, and she thinks it makes Obama look "silly."
"I’ve come to learn through this journey that there are many other families that have been lied to by the military about their sons and daughters and so we feel that what happen to Pat is pertains to other people, not just us. I think it’s a slap in the face to all soldiers to appoint this man, to be on this committee," she said.
Amir Bar-Lev, the director of the critically-acclaimed documentary "The Tillman Story" was nothing if not blunt: “Putting Stanley McChrystal in charge of a commission on military families is a little like putting Bernie Madoff in charge of a commission on pensions," he told Tapper.
Monday, April 11, 2011
Obama Deconstructed
The following post was written by Kate Madison of Depoe Bay, Oregon, in response to Paul Krugman's column today questioning the whereabouts of President Obama.
First of all, Barack Obama never knew his father--met him twice in his life. He was raised and influenced mainly by strong women, his mother and grandmother. Grandfather was a nice guy, seemed to finish last and had a hard time keeping a job-- not an inspiring male role model, to be sure. His mother was an effective mediator and organizer; her life's mission was to bring understanding and economic power to 3rd world women. One can see how the torch was passed to his sister, Maya, who is doing the same kind of work in Hawaii. Read her profile in last week's Nation magazine to see that the "apple does not fall far from the tree."
About Barack Obama--a more difficult situation, obviously. He was encouraged and educated in the best schools mother and grandparents could afford--and was so smart he got full scholarships. Still......there is the ghost of his father--a brilliant, aggressive, ambitious, but irresponsible drunk, who later died in a (probably alcohol related) car accident.
Barack, the son, has both his father, mother and grandmother in him--incompatible, impossible ghosts, one might say. He is ambitious and a brilliant orator, but also (first and foremost), like his influential mother, comfortable only in his role as a mediator. So....that is who we have for a President. A basically good man, but so inclined to mediate and reconcile that he does not possess other options about how to function. Yet he has tremendous ambition. You might say it is in his genes. Would that the world operated in a saner way. We know it does not. I believe that is why Obama has hired such aggressive, psychopathic operatives to keep the path open. He cannot do it himself, but does not hesitate to find those who can do it for him.
..."What have they done with President Obama? What happened to the inspirational figure his supporters thought they elected? Who is this bland, timid guy who doesn’t seem to stand for anything in particular? "
You have not really asked for a psychological "autopsy," but that is what I am inclined to give--rather than a "they did it" answer.
First of all, Barack Obama never knew his father--met him twice in his life. He was raised and influenced mainly by strong women, his mother and grandmother. Grandfather was a nice guy, seemed to finish last and had a hard time keeping a job-- not an inspiring male role model, to be sure. His mother was an effective mediator and organizer; her life's mission was to bring understanding and economic power to 3rd world women. One can see how the torch was passed to his sister, Maya, who is doing the same kind of work in Hawaii. Read her profile in last week's Nation magazine to see that the "apple does not fall far from the tree."
About Barack Obama--a more difficult situation, obviously. He was encouraged and educated in the best schools mother and grandparents could afford--and was so smart he got full scholarships. Still......there is the ghost of his father--a brilliant, aggressive, ambitious, but irresponsible drunk, who later died in a (probably alcohol related) car accident.
Barack, the son, has both his father, mother and grandmother in him--incompatible, impossible ghosts, one might say. He is ambitious and a brilliant orator, but also (first and foremost), like his influential mother, comfortable only in his role as a mediator. So....that is who we have for a President. A basically good man, but so inclined to mediate and reconcile that he does not possess other options about how to function. Yet he has tremendous ambition. You might say it is in his genes. Would that the world operated in a saner way. We know it does not. I believe that is why Obama has hired such aggressive, psychopathic operatives to keep the path open. He cannot do it himself, but does not hesitate to find those who can do it for him.
Kate is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker who had a private practice in Washington, D.C., Virginia and Maryland from 1973 to 2004. She studied Family Systems theory with Murray Bowen at Georgetown University, and became interested in the inter-generational transmission process of emotional issues in families. Though Kate is officially retired from full-time practice and currently living on the Oregon Coast, she remains active in the field, and is presently supervising therapists in the D.C. area in family systems thinking and application. She frequently contributes to the comments boards of op-ed pieces in The New York Times.
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Serious Scalpels and Mendacious Machetes
I knew there was a reason my email from the President announcing his re-election campaign got jammed next to a Proactiv ad in my spam folder last Monday. It's because he is going to be proactive for a change, and give a speech on the deficit in just three more days! We don't know the details yet, but his point-man, David Plouffe was all over the TV jabberfests this morning to tout it.
I just looked over a written transcript of Plouffe on "Meet the Press" and was able to formulate a rough idea as to the predictable uplifting vagueness (inspiroratory) we can expect. Plouffe used the words "moving/going forward" a total of nine times, and "come together" for a grand tally of seven -- in just the first few minutes. Therefore, we can rest assured that the Obama speech will contain lots of winning the future and bipartisan bullshit. We'll hear more sermonizing on shared sacrifice, historic cuts, visiting our national monuments and national parks, marriage counseling tips to stop all the bickering, lots of ideas on lots of tables, as well as a bit of David Brooksian S&M drivel on the joys of pain and belt-tightening. And it will not be complete without some philosophical hovering above the fray, with Obama talking about Democrats and Republicans as if he were not partisan himself. Actually, he is, but it's Republican-lite, and that is not an official party (yet). But I am counting on at least one pointed, blaming dig at Congress and how "the American people" are fed up and sick of "the way things are done (by others) in Washington". And that "we" (meaning they) will do better, because that's why we/they were sent to Washington, to do better.
Paul Krugman, who was pretty dismayed by Friday's Democrat capitulation on the budget, writes on his blog that he dreads the speech and wouldn't put it past Obama to call for privatizing Medicare. Since that is what Paul Ryan wants too, Obama might do what Obama does best, and start negotiating by preemptively offering Republicans twice what they're asking for and then settling for 400 percent. He still hasn't figured out his job description. But many are calling him Mediator in Chief, and those are the ones who are being kind.
The only thing we are being told is that Obama will use a selective scalpel to slice and dice, as opposed to the vicious machete of Paul Ryan and the Austerian Hordes. Paul Ryan was also on TV this morning, and he was every bit as vague as Plouffe. And yes, the pundits are still calling his plan to privatize, and thus kill, Medicare "bold." I think it's only because they don't know how to spell, or pronounce, chutzpah. H-u-t-s-p-a. Here are some more synonyms the vocabulary-challenged chattering class might consider for Ryan's budget plan: reckless, overreaching, brazen, overweening, rash, unmitigated gall, mendacious, nasty, brutal, vicious, moronic, math-challenged, politically suicidal. It sure makes whatever death by a thousand sterile incisions Obama is planning under the anesthesia of his rhetoric seem painless in comparison. But maybe that's the whole plan.
 |
| I'll Give It to the Republicans.... 200% of What They Want! |
I knew there was a reason my email from the President announcing his re-election campaign got jammed next to a Proactiv ad in my spam folder last Monday. It's because he is going to be proactive for a change, and give a speech on the deficit in just three more days! We don't know the details yet, but his point-man, David Plouffe was all over the TV jabberfests this morning to tout it.
I just looked over a written transcript of Plouffe on "Meet the Press" and was able to formulate a rough idea as to the predictable uplifting vagueness (inspiroratory) we can expect. Plouffe used the words "moving/going forward" a total of nine times, and "come together" for a grand tally of seven -- in just the first few minutes. Therefore, we can rest assured that the Obama speech will contain lots of winning the future and bipartisan bullshit. We'll hear more sermonizing on shared sacrifice, historic cuts, visiting our national monuments and national parks, marriage counseling tips to stop all the bickering, lots of ideas on lots of tables, as well as a bit of David Brooksian S&M drivel on the joys of pain and belt-tightening. And it will not be complete without some philosophical hovering above the fray, with Obama talking about Democrats and Republicans as if he were not partisan himself. Actually, he is, but it's Republican-lite, and that is not an official party (yet). But I am counting on at least one pointed, blaming dig at Congress and how "the American people" are fed up and sick of "the way things are done (by others) in Washington". And that "we" (meaning they) will do better, because that's why we/they were sent to Washington, to do better.
Paul Krugman, who was pretty dismayed by Friday's Democrat capitulation on the budget, writes on his blog that he dreads the speech and wouldn't put it past Obama to call for privatizing Medicare. Since that is what Paul Ryan wants too, Obama might do what Obama does best, and start negotiating by preemptively offering Republicans twice what they're asking for and then settling for 400 percent. He still hasn't figured out his job description. But many are calling him Mediator in Chief, and those are the ones who are being kind.
The only thing we are being told is that Obama will use a selective scalpel to slice and dice, as opposed to the vicious machete of Paul Ryan and the Austerian Hordes. Paul Ryan was also on TV this morning, and he was every bit as vague as Plouffe. And yes, the pundits are still calling his plan to privatize, and thus kill, Medicare "bold." I think it's only because they don't know how to spell, or pronounce, chutzpah. H-u-t-s-p-a. Here are some more synonyms the vocabulary-challenged chattering class might consider for Ryan's budget plan: reckless, overreaching, brazen, overweening, rash, unmitigated gall, mendacious, nasty, brutal, vicious, moronic, math-challenged, politically suicidal. It sure makes whatever death by a thousand sterile incisions Obama is planning under the anesthesia of his rhetoric seem painless in comparison. But maybe that's the whole plan.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)