By
"The Doktor"
To solve
the housing crisis, we could start with an agency (We could call it the
Submoreme, for Subprime Mortgage Remuneration) with the power to seize bank
accounts, and seize the accounts and holdings and property of every single
lender, mortgage broker or banker or anyone else who made millions or even
hundreds of thousands by writing bad paper to make some easy money. Then create
an escrow account and use that money from the crooks, I mean lenders, to pay
down the principle on the underwater mortgages. Those lenders and brokers and
bankers are the people who are paid to know better, paid to pay attention to
comps in any given area, paid to only give loans to people who can reasonably
be expected to pay their bills in a timely manner, paid good money to NOT push
a million dollar house on a couple who can't possibly make the payments.
This isn't about blame, it's about who got the money, and how to
get it back. Putting people out of their houses, or forcing them to lose any
hope of equity and then in a cruel twist have them pay someone else who gets
the house that they wanted to own in the first place... that is just
shepherding more money and wealth to the elite 1% and preventing working people
from getting ahead. If they wanted to rent all they'd have to do is walk away!
There is no single panacea for the housing crisis because it is
extremely complex and completely intertwined with the financial crisis and the
unemployment crisis and the income disparity crisis, grasping at the same old
fixes ain't gonna get it. One thing Obama has said repeatedly is very true, it
took decades to get here, it won't be fixed overnight.We need some operating
capital, so like it or not the people/corporations who have huge stockpiles of
cash have some tough decisions to make ; hold onto it and continue to use the
bogus greedy disgusting laws and lack of regulation that they bought and paid
to get enacted and keep gutting our society until something snaps and people go
berserk or start investing in America. We can help the mortgage crisis by doing
several things simultaneously, lower interest rates substantially for what have
been referred to as "good actors" immediately, freeing up some
disposable income so people can start going back to home depot and buying flowers
and lights etc, For those that request it there should also be a mortgage
principle and interest payment suspension (deferment) allowed in 6 month
increments of up to 60 months, interest will still accrue, you still have to
pay your taxes and insurance, but the principle payments people can then use to
spend on necessities, again freeing up necessary disposable income which will
be spent immediately.
Lowering principles is going to be very damned difficult, done on a case by case basis, forcing people to sell defeats the purpose. The losses have to fall on the people who are responsible, the original lender mostly and partly on some original buyers, and in some fewer cases mostly the buyer, your "bad actors" who for the most part are strawmen propped up by right wingers spreading hatred among Americans. A moratorium on all foreclosures would be another first step measure, while this whole mess gets sorted out.
The hypocritical lying republican politicians have been caught with their pants down around their ankles again as they whine about cutting military spending and the job losses it will cause. After we've had to listen to their despicable lies about how the government can't create jobs for the last four years, while they knowingly tanked the economy for political gain. I have zero tolerance for any right wing talking points along these lines.
The American people paid for the infrastructure of this country
and then it became the envy of the rest of the world. Large corporations made
hundreds of billions of dollars using that United States infrastructure ( U.S.
INF) and gaining access to the wealthiest consumers on the planet while they
hired teams of lawyers and accountants to figure out how not to pay their fair
share of maintaining the U.S. INF and then they hired teams of lobbyists to get
laws enacted to make sure they couldn't be charged for using the U.S. INF. I
think we need two new U.S. INF taxes implemented; #1 A use it or lose it
U.S.INF tax on any corporation with over one hundred million in cash doing business
in the U.S. has to invest in specific U.S. INF projects which may include U.S.
building renovation and U.S. equipment purchases or U.S. job creation or face
an annual 70% tax on these monies, onshore or offshore with new powers for the
IRS allowing them access to all accounts anywhere in the world. #2 A 7% U.S.INF
tax on ALL internet sales, e-bay, Amazon, everything. This tax would be
collected by the seller and paid to the State of residence for the end user of
the product sold. So if I live in Colorado and my Mom lives in Florida and I
buy her a new TV for Mothers Day on Amazon, Florida gets the U.S.INF tax money
for using their roads etc. The States are going broke because of falling
revenues and small local brick and mortar businesses are facing increasing
pressure to compete with internet sellers not burdened with taxes or sales
staffs or rent, we can help level the playing field for small business ( real
small businesses not the fake designations of late ) by at least making
internet sellers pay their fair share for the roads and police and fire depts
they count on to deliver their goods safely to American consumers. The end
phenomenon of these policies is ideally to create jobs and promote local small
business, and of course return our infrastructure to its former status.
There are multiple arguments to be made for raising taxes on the
wealthy, especially as so many republicans are clamoring for high troop levels
to remain in Afghanistan. Small businesses aren't making any money off of these
wars for profit, it's mega-corps who should be getting hit with taxes, we
should have a tax holiday, but for small businesses and workers; Put the SS tax
back in place and grant a real payroll tax holiday, no payroll tax on the first
$30,000 in earnings for working class people who earn up to $75,000 a year, and
a matching holiday for real ( not the Koch Bro.s or Bechtel or Apple etc. )
small businesses that employ them. Then let's see President Obama simply do
what he said he would do, up the taxes on those earning over $250,000 a year,
and raise capital gains taxes back up to 35% for anyone in that bracket as
well. As far as the corporations who have been gaming the system hoping for a
tax holiday tell them they've got 30 days of "The Good Ole Days" left
and then the IRS is coming after them with a vengeance and will be charging
penalties and interest like you've never seen... We've had to listen to that
slobbering drunk Boehner for months telling the entire world the United States
is broke, so blame it on him and go get the money these cheaters owe us; the
hard working taxpayers who live here and play by the rules. We've got a revenue
problem coupled with waste and fraud being committed by some of the very same
corporations saying President Obama is anti-business while working class
Americans ( I think he could even get some tea party supporters out of this )
are getting the rug pulled out from underneath of them after doing what they
were supposed to do for decades. And by all means lower the corporate rate and broaden
the base by eliminating loopholes.
We'll need even more cash I'm sure, so let's legalize marijuana and tax that, not as ridiculously as we do liquor, but even so that will provide jobs and revenue and we can cut the DEA's budget providing even more money for a much more worthwhile program known as Job Corps! It's a great training program with decades of proven success in helping underprivileged youth, that is kind of like a cross between the military and a technical school, kids live on campus away from home, are supervised by trained counselors and dormitory monitors who tend to be ex-military or ex-teachers, they accrue savings for every successful month of training, get a clothing allowance and have a job placement service available to them. They are scattered across the country in varying sizes and complexity of training, giving instruction in many critical areas such as but not limited to; Carpentry- Apprenticeship etc., Nursing, Secretarial, Computers, Automotive, Heavy Duty Diesel, etc. etc., but it is a great program that needs to be aggressively funded.
More Money you say? No problem say I; There seems to be a segment of society that loves ostentation and burning copious amounts of fossil fuel... for this demographic I suggest a symbol of their opulent ostentation for all to see; A GOLDEN EMBLEM for their windshield that must be renewed each and every year, for every single mile per gallon under 30mpg that chosen vehicle averages they will have the privilege of paying $10,000. So if you want to drive a Hummer that gets 4mpg it will set you back $260,000 to register that pig. Or your Rolls or Bentley or Lamborghini or what have you...
And of course we'll stipulate the registration fees are for non-farm use only.
As the U.S. treasury starts to fill up after we have gone after offshore accounts and cheaters like romney finally start paying their fair share, maybe we can finally start working towards a living wage, which I think should be instituted along with a return to apprenticeships. So the basic problem facing small business owners who want to hire someone is how can the person being hired generate enough profit to pay his own wage and earn the business itself enough money to justify his/her employment. trading dollars just won’t work, consumerism is based on repeated sales for repeated and growing profit margins. As we begin to look a little deeper into the hiring and another often overlooked aspect is the training of a new hire... if we’re talking about a younger person, even into the mid to late 20’s, rarely 30’s, these people have never held a job before so they have no idea how to “work” at a job. There is a complete and total different set of rules and expectations than there is for socializing or attending school or University. Before I get too far into the weeds on this let’s back up and arbitrarily pick a white kid from an average home in the suburbs whose family consists of four people, one son ( our subject) a daughter, Mom & Dad, and they gross about $140,000. They are college educated, successful people with no major worries about having a nice home, nice cars, 4G phones and iPads, and good health insurance. This kid wants a really nice car and his parents have told him he has to help pay for it by getting a job. The way it works now, unless one of his parents knows somebody, he’ll get a job paying minimum wage at $7.25 an hour doing something mindless for the most part. But at first, it actually costs the business owner quite a bit of money to train the first time worker. He doesn’t even know how to stand still and pay attention without looking slovenly or dozing off. He doesn’t understand that he has to actually produce something of value to justify his employment and paycheck. I know people who have worked their whole lives and not come to full comprehension of those two facts! It is precisely these issues that make it so difficult for an employer to survive in todays market, I propose a new age apprenticeship program funded by a number of new taxes and fees placed on multi-national corporations and monopolies who use clever euphemisms to engage in monopolistic practices every day. We have recently been informed that there are vast amounts of cash being kept out circulation, to the tune of 21 to 32 trillion dollars, numbers remarkably close to what was lost in the Bush recession.... So, we would use a sliding scale to pay the employee a living wage, the employer would pay very little at first and the new hire would be subsidized by the Living Wage Apprenticeship Program ( LWAP ) while he/she is being trained on the job, obviously a 17 year old living on his/her own would need to make a lot more money than our affluent white kid. The employer would need to be compensated as well, once again on a sliding scale based on the type of business, difficulty/danger of the work etc.
Campaign finance reform; trying to get money out of politics would be like trying to get money out of prostitution.... I've been meaning to start a petition to fix the problem thusly; ALL political contributions have to be 50/50- 50 percent to whoever you donated to and 50 percent to a taxpayer lobbying group comprised of working Americans who direct the money into schools or recycling, environmental cleanup, research, job training, lobbying certain members of congress for citizen concerns etc. So let 'em donate all the billions they want because we'll get half of it to do the peoples business.
In my opinion we need to forego political demagoguery and actually
come up with a workable plan to liberate the United States from the shackles of
foreign energy imports. At least from countries that don't like us, because we
only have access to 3% of the worlds oil reserves and we consume 25%, so in
order to free ourselves we have to have a reduction in oil consumption no
matter what.
Oil shale is basically a rock that
has to be fracked and mined and then have the oil extracted from it, that
process burns a lot of energy and oil to accomplish, giving the process an ROEI
of almost one to one; you burn a gallon of oil to get a gallon of oil, making
oil shale basically useless....
Natural gas could be a good
transitional fuel because we could convert gasoline burning delivery fleet
trucks without too much trouble, but natural gas as a fuel for the internal
combustion engine yields lower horse power, shorter overall distances, and
fails to lubricate and cool certain valve train components. It is because of
the latter problem that gas burning engines would need an extensive conversion
to be able to burn NG successfully, which could be done on ALL local garbage
trucks, and delivery fleets of UPS, Fedex, Beer Trucks, etc. you name it -who
don't do long haul OTR or mountainous routes.
The aforementioned conversion could
be done as an added scheduled maintenance procedure, however it would still
cost thousands of dollars, which is why I suggested the business owner should
be able to write at least a substantial part of that expense off of their taxes
at the end of the year.
Hybrids and electrics hold great
promise for urban commuters and as more are sold and developed the price will
come down and the need for tax breaks ( subsidies ) will decrease over time.
Volkswagon TDI diesel technology has
consistently been way ahead of the curve compared to other fossil fuel burning
vehicle efficiency. They can actually rival or exceed some hybrids!
I mention these because they all
achieve the goal of lowering oil consumption.
We don't know all of the consequences
from fracking for natural gas, so the "Haliburton Exemption" needs to
go so we know what's happening and where.
I am also very intrigued and excited
by the possibility that thorium fueled nuclear reactors which produce 99% less
waste than uranium, could provide safe clean power for a thousand years with
the fuel available inside of the United States. Thorium was initially under
consideration as a fuel source for small portable reactors in long range
bombers, which raises the possibility of continuing along those lines of
development as well...
In addition, thorium reactors can't
melt down ( utilizing Carlos Rubbia's ADS ), the little waste they do produce
has a half life of 200 years, instead of 200,000, and can actually burn our
current stockpiles of nuclear waste! Harry Reid should be trying to build the
first thorium reactors in Nevada, thereby killing two birds with one stone.
Hydrogen powered vehicles face many
of the same obstacles as NG vehicles, but with virtually no dangerous emissions
it must of necessity be considered as well.
Also I think every new residential
home should have both a wind turbine and a solar array installed at the time of
initial construction, which will cut the cost of installation by as much as
70%. Use the power for the hot water heater which can store electricity as
latent heat energy in the water itself- if they are as inefficient as some on
these threads say they are. If they are more efficient then we'll all get a
bonus.
 |
| (Painting by Norman Rockwell) |
