Pick Your Fascism

Since the pandemic is transforming the traditional Election Day into Election Season with early mail-in balloting, the Establishment's' Get Out the Vote campaign is more strident than ever.

These last few weeks of Decision 2020 feel like being swept along in a turgid stream of elite consciousness. As hard as we try to swim against the tide of the Most Consequential Election in the history of humanity, the more they try to drown us with their voter-shaming - when they're not mentally electrocuting us with their jolts of nuclear-powered gaslight.

I didn't know whether to gulp for air or melt down into an abject puddle when the Duke and Duchess of Sussex (Harry and Meghan) deigned to inform me, from the rustic grounds of their $14 million California estate, that I am allowed to "make my voice heard." 

I must use my voice to check a box to prove that I matter, Meghan nattered.

Voting will prove that I hate hatred enough to elect one of their own in order maintain "our values." And here I was, too lazy and ignorant to even realize that the magical festival of Quadrannius has finally arrived! It is that special time that comes only once every four years, when the oligarchs and celebrities go all noblesse oblige  to wake up the citizens from the cynicism and the apathy that their bitter pills have created. If we do not give them the degree of legitimacy with which to feed us even more of their bitter pills for the next four years, then they'll end up looking like the quacks they are instead of the healers they want to resemble.

To press the point home, Harry was not above playing  the guilt-tripping, gaslighting card. Give 'em hell, Harry! He reminded us with his Voice that we regular people are even more important and privileged than he is. Because as a royal personage, he has been dreadfully disenfranchised for his whole adult life!

Bertram Gross  warned 40 years ago of the "Friendly Fascism" that was taking over this country and the rest of the advanced free world. Although the parts of the book dealing with the then-bugaboos of Soviet communism and "stagflation" are dated, he was remarkably prescient about the slow, boiling-frog-death of representative democracy via an insidious corporate/oligarchic coup.

The "F" word has finally come out of the elite closet with the victory of Donald Trump. But that is only because he is an "unfriendly" fascist who rules with a sneer and a scowl instead of with the simper and the smile which has been fooling some of the people most of the time, or at least most of the people some of the time, as the frog-water simmered. Whenever the bath threatened to boil over and wake up the comatose frogs, friendly-looking presidents like Barack Obama added the requisite dose of cool charm to augment the glow of the gaslight.

Donald Trump, of course, is only adding salt to the water and gasoline to the fire. He is riling people up when they should be narcotized. He is not using what Gross called Triplespeak: the political propaganda technique comprised of "myth, jargon and confidential straight talk."

Gross wrote:

"Unlike Orwell's doublethink and newspeak, triplespeak is not part of any overall plan. It merely develops as a logical outcome of the Establishment;s maturation, an essential element of the tightening of oligarchic control."

Without myths like American exceptionalism, democracy  and the founding pioneer spirit, rulers cannot maintain order and support at the lower and middle levels of the Establishment. Jargon is required to justify the power and secrecy and violence of the military/surveillance state. Straight talk is the ploy used by elites to explain why secrecy is needed in the first place, or blather about the brutal hard truth of why social programs must be cut.

Trump, the damaged epitome of immaturity, rails against the surveillance state when it is used by his fellow elites against him. He calls vaunted military heroes "chumps and losers," while the more proper pols glorify their deaths as "the ultimate sacrifice." He directly foments violence, dispensing with all the obfuscatory jargon about human rights and morality which masks the friendly fascism his peers have striven so mightily to perfect.

And therefore, establishment media outlets are manically selling Wokeness in a valiant effort to arouse us just long enough to care about electing Joe Biden - before they put us (along with the street protests they are so eagerly covering) to sleep again, once the danger to their legitimacy passes.

Why else would celebrities and political elites be co-opting the police murder of Breonna Taylor, who lingered in obscurity until the televised murder of George Floyd made her the newest symbol of the moment? Why would the liberal establishment be able to so blithely ignore Obama's drone murders and mass deportations and police crackdowns on the Occupy movement, but now decry Trump's xenophobia and flouting of the Constitution?

It's all about the language, of course. Trump does not, as Gross's friendlier fascists do, "take over the symbols of opposition groups" and make them his own.  As the opposite of Trump's nihilistic shtick, Bertram Gross shares the secret ingredients of the friendly fascist recipe:

"Peace, equality, black power, women's rights, the Constitution, for example,are prominent in the sloganry justifying increased armament, oligarchic wealth, institutionalized white and male supremacy, and the subversion of constitutional rights."

The reason that I hope Joe Biden wins (although, with the luxury of living in a non-battleground state, I don't plan to vote for either him or Trump), is that he is often so miserably inept himself at putting a friendly face on the fascism that long preceded Trump. His campaign has had to walk back his constant stream of "gaffes" almost as often as Trump's handlers have to do damage control on his. Biden wouldn't ever be able to fool enough the people enough of the time, no matter how hard Bernie Sanders and MSNBC try to prop him, and more importantly, the Democratic Party, up.

Biden's immediate reaction, for example, to the no-bill grand jury exoneration of the Louisville SWAT team that gunned down Breonna Taylor was to warn protesters against destroying property.

And as the media very well knows, Trump can never be goaded into saying he'd accept a peaceful transition to power if he loses. Such an admission runs counter to every narcissistic fiber of his damaged being.  We'll probably be hearing Republican disclaimers of his face-saving threats from now until January and beyond, should he lose to Biden.

The first canned battle of these two snarling, smirking geriatric right-wingers will, at least, be an entertaining ratings bonanza of epic WWF proportions.

May our voices of derision finally be heard by the voter-shaming concern trolls. May our feet plod to the polls (or the mailbox) before they race right back to the streets, no matter which of these reactionary characters mounts to an ever more discredited platform of power.

Not So Friendly Fascism

"As I look at America today, I am not afraid to say I am afraid," wrote the late political scientist and Truman administration adviser Bertram Gross about the creeping threat that he called Friendly Fascism.

It is only with the rise of Donald Trump, who wears his totalitarian mindset on his sleeve and bellows out the hatred loud and clear through his big fat mouth, that even the mainstream media are finally daring to utter the dreaded F word, 35 years after Gross presciently spelled it all out for us.

Bertram Gross

Under Carter, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II and Obama, the preferred labels have been "corporatism"  or "neoliberalism" -- a partnership between government and big business whose main purpose is rewarding the wealthy at the expense of everyone else. And it's all been effected through the free and fair elections of "participatory democracy."

American-style fascism has been around for decades. But until Trump came along to fill the democratic gap with his own brand of Unfriendly Fascism, most people preferred not to acknowledge the awful truth. It has helped immensely, of course, that each of our recent presidents has been blessed with a relatively warm and outgoing personality. Ronald Reagan made the world melt with his avuncular smile. Even George W. Bush was voted the most favorite guy you'd like to have a beer with, continuing right where  Bill  "I feel your pain" Clinton had left off, with his slick down-home campaign of "ending welfare as we know it," Wall Street deregulation and job-killing trade deals.

And even our great national Bush nightmare seemed short-lived, tempered by some surface pushback from the Democratic establishment and the dream election of dream candidate Barack Obama, who himself has presided over an ever-widening gap between rich and poor and an escalation of nuke manufacture and military adventurism. But he still talks a good populist game when he feels like it.

 How soon we forget that his administration spied on and ultimately tear-gassed the Occupy camps right out of existence before gaining his second term in office. How easily most Americans are able to gloss right over his war on journalists and whistleblowers, his drone assassinations of thousands of people (if they're not nameless "militants", then they're always the latest high-ranking Al Qaeda leader), his record deportations of thousands of refugees and migrants fleeing the violence and poverty of US-dependent and spawned fascisms in the Global South countries, and the loading of his administration with millionaires from the criminal enterprises known as banks. And then there's his championship of the various global corporate coups euphemized as "trade deals."

  Given his personality, intellectual prowess, and acting skills, it is still considered really bad taste to slap friendly Barack Obama (whose approval rating is again soaring above 50 percent) and even his cold hawkish pal Hillary Clinton with the fascist label. But Donald Trump is fair game. He doesn't pretend to be something that he is not. He wears his con artistry and his racism and his misogyny like badges of honor. If he's compared to Mussolini, if he is endorsed by North Korea and Russia, then he considers them to be compliments of the highest order. If he cheated some fairly well-to-do marks out of some of their cash in another get-rich-quick real estate scam cynically labeled "Trump University", that's his right as an American titan. Hucksterism is as American as Mom and apple pie and the flag.

Trump is what happens when, as Gross wrote, "the formal democratic machinery nourished by establishment promises -- too often rendered false -- of more human rights, more civil rights and civil liberties.... is contrasted with crass materialism and dog-eat-dog competition." In other words, the mixed messages we've received have rendered enough of us confused enough to embrace the simplistic solutions and aggrieved worldview of Donald Trump. We have been invited to channel our hopes and dreams, as well as our long-simmering resentments, against both plutocrats and our fellow les miserables, into the candidacy of one of the most famous crass materialists and competitors the world has ever known. We are only doing what we've subliminally been ordered to do all along by the purveyors of Friendly Fascism: love thy neighbor, sure, but don't ever hesitate to advance your own selfish selves at the same time. Be a winner!

  And now the purveyors are crying foul because they can't control the "charismacho" monster they've very deliberately created in their inhumane Laboratory of Neoliberalism.

Back in the Reagan years, when Gross published his book warning of creeping fascism, he listed 10 sources of optimism which he hoped would stem its tide. Read them and weep:

1. A vibrant anti-war movement, which pushed the Reagan administration into arms control negotiations with the still-extant Soviet Union.

2. An anti-nuclear power and environmental movement "that has been a decisive factor in stopping the growth of the nuclear energy industry in the U.S."

3. "A neighborhood movement that has brought millions of ordinary people, conservatives included, into responsible activism against corporate and bureaucratic exploitation."

4. Labor unions "that are likely to be radicalized by the pressure of a rank-and-file indignant over rising unemployment, provocative anti-union federal policies and intense corporate efforts to roll back earlier wage and workplace victories."

5. Government employees who have collectively been joining labor unions in larger numbers and "who have often been willing to blow the whistle in public" about Reagan's racist and pro-plutocrat policies.

6. Civil liberties and civil rights organizations... are "fighting back militantly against almost every one of the Reaganite assaults on the Bill of Rights."

7. "Organizations of older people that have already proved their mettle by beating back one after another of the Reaganite attacks on social security entitlements... and in the case of the Gray Panthers, playing a key role in nursing the embryonic full employment movement."

8. "The small beginnings of a more serious socialist presence with the merger of the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee and the New American movement into the New Democratic Socialists of America (D.S.A.)"

9. "Continuing progress, despite the regressive forces of sexism and homophobia, in the extending the liberating values of the women's movements and the civil and human rights of lesbians and gay men."

10. "In the words of Kusum Singh, a warm current of 'bottom-sideways communication' among people who are fed up with the elitism, snobbery and hierarchy of most private and public democracies and are inventing democratic leadership styles that escape 'charismacho.'

Well, at least part of Gross's Number Nine dream has come true. And Number Ten is alive and kicking, despite the charismacho campaign of Trump. Whether his brand of nasty fascism can be wholly emasculated is unlikely, given that the consolidated media, led by some of the highest-paid CEOs in America, just can't quit the mega-bucks he is bringing them. Even an empty Trump podium has more value for them and their sponsors than either a boring technocratic speech by Hillary Clinton or a plutocracy-threatening barn burner of a Bernie Sanders rally. And if the CEOs can instigate and document the growing police state violence outside the Trump venues, it's all the more titillating and remunerative for them. What do they care? Their pampered hides are protected by their own private security details and gated communities, and their obscene wads of cash are protected in both off-shore accounts and domestic LLCs.

Bombast at Comcast: The Consolidated Media Candidate

Friendly Fascism is so yesterday for these people. "Bring on the noise, bring on the Trump" has replaced the Fairness Doctrine, which federally mandated broadcasting in the public interest. And in true friendly fascist fashion (say three times fast) the New York Times has portrayed the modern Frankensteins as "struggling" valiantly to contain their creation. "The television news industry is wrestling with how to balance fairness, credibility and the temptations of sky-high ratings as it prepares for a presidential matchup like none other," the Gray Lady simpered. "Still, the presence of Mr. Trump can be irresistible, especially in an election in which viewership and advertising rates have soared, generating tens of millions of dollars in additional revenue for an industry threatened by digital competition."

Oh, what a quandary for the hyper-rich media moguls, so threatened by the digital competition. Forget the threat to democracy itself in the person of Trump. This is a threat to dog-eat-dog capitalism and endless growth, so who cares if the cancer dies right along with the host?

And despite all his own made for TV pearl-clutching over Trump and the media circus, Barack Obama isn't at all interested in bringing back the Fairness Doctrine. The public interest is not only the least of the Establishment's worries, it is antithetical to their own interest: money begetting power begetting more money begetting more power in an endless, toxic closed feedback loop of greed.

Look again at Numbers One Through Eight of Bertram Gross's Wish List. They make Bernie Sanders's "radical agenda" look downright reasonable and moderate in comparison. And yet to the Neoliberal Thought Collective, the senator from Vermont is the reanimation of the Red Menace.

Fascism is here, it's entrenched, and it's anything but friendly despite the sober-sided smiley-face propagandists pretending to do battle with the Trumpmonster. So how about we all get together and beat up all the bullies in all their various and extra-Trumpian forms? The Sanders campaign has been a nudge in the right direction. A neighborhood movement (see #3) made up of millions of people from across the ideological spectrum is just the kind of solidarity that will make the reptile people quake in their Ferragamo Python loafers (list price, $985).