The people in charge of the country are now openly admitting that the select committee hearings on the attempted January 6th coup will be more of a glitzy political ad dressed up as a nail-biting Netflix series than it will be a slow, plodding search for truth and justice. But it will most assuredly have the "American way" written all over it.
Just to make sure that the watching public tunes in, the Democrats on the committee have hired the former head honcho of ABC-Disney to be their show-runner. The series will thus be heavy on the teasers and the cliff-hangers. Live action will be interspersed with "never-before-seen" footage of the riot, along with secret tapes of Ivanka and Jared dishing the dirt to the committee in secret.
The news site Axios, which also has its own series on HBO-Max, had the big scoop on the secret show-biz brains behind the show, with Mike Allen breathlessly gushing:
James Goldston, former president of ABC News, and a master documentary storyteller who ran "Good Morning America" and "Nightline" — has joined the committee as an unannounced adviser, Axios has learned.
Why it matters: I'm told Goldston is busily producing Thursday's 8 p.m. ET hearing as if it were a blockbuster investigative special.He plans to make it raw enough so that skeptical journalists will find the material fresh, and chew over the disclosures in future coverage.
And he wants it to draw the eyeballs of Americans who haven't followed the ins and outs of the Capitol riot probe.
The so-called "probe" has only been ongoing for the past year and a half, with only a few of the hundreds of relatively low-level participants being charged and/or convicted thus far. The plot about the plot advanced ever so slightly this week with a carefully planned show "teaser" of five members of the Proud Boys right-wing militia group belatedly being charged with sedition. This will add some much needed oomph when the TV Special is able to cast these characters as bona fide marquee traitors, rather than the usual boring old suspects not even rating a screen credit.
Remember when the corporate media were singing the constant refrain of "The Walls Are Closing In" regarding Trump and the drip-drip-drip narrative of #Russiagate, until it finally ended up as a sorry little puddle of nothingness? Well, they are urging you to keep the hope alive, because this time around, as one Democratic operative promised, the walls are now closing in so hard that the dome will be blown right off the Capitol, what with all the brand-spanking new plot twists and big reveals coming out of this televised extravaganza.
The New York Times, which tried to keep its own gushery in strict control, buried the lede that a corporate media mogul is being allowed to run this official public inquiry into the attempted overthrow of our allegedly democratic system. But the Grey Lady still was refreshingly honest in describing the hearings as nothing more than a prolonged political ad designed to increase the chances of Democrats in the midterms. The headline makes it perfectly clear that the real purpose of the hearing is not to punish Donald Trump or his high-ranking minions, but to keep the Donald Trump menacing myth alive in the brain fog of the apathetic electorate. The motive is right there in the headline:
Jan. 6 Hearings Give Democrats a Chance to Recast Midterm Message
With their control of Congress hanging in the balance, Democrats plan to use made-for-television moments and a carefully choreographed rollout of revelations over the course of six hearings to remind the public of the magnitude of Mr. Trump’s effort to overturn the election, and to persuade voters that the coming midterm elections are a chance to hold Republicans accountable for it.
It is an uphill battle at a time when polls show that voters’ attention is focused elsewhere, including on inflation, rising coronavirus cases and record-high gas prices. But Democrats argue the hearings will give them a platform for making a broader case about why they deserve to stay in power.
“When these hearings are over, voters will know how irresponsibly complicit Republicans were in attempting to toss out their vote and just how far Republicans will go to gain power for themselves,” said Representative Sean Patrick Maloney, the Democratic campaign chair.
That would be the same Sean Patrick Maloney who heads the fund-raising arm of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and who recently muscled his way into a redrawn district for fear he couldn't even win back his own constituents in the mid-terms.
"Maloney’s move may be the most brazenly selfish district hop in American political history," writes The Intercept. "That’s not said lightly, given that Maloney is operating in an industry — politics — that is populated almost exclusively by some of the most craven, attention-seeking people in our society."
Having just binged on the entire Sopranos series, I can't help but think of the Select Committee hearings as a show about feuding organized crime families. Will the audience root for the Democrats or the Republicans in this derivative mob war? The latter already are streaming out their own counter-programming, gleaned mainly from never before seen X-rated outtakes from Hunter Biden's laptop, featuring his naked self pointing a gun at the cameras like a deranged Christopher Moltisanti, and thus making a complete mockery of the Dems' latest gun "control" theatrics.
We are expected to empathize with the vulnerability and panic attacks of a bunch of sociopaths who just unanimously sent unlimited dollars to fight a proxy war in Ukraine, but who quibble and moan about spending any more money on the health care of their constituents, right in the middle of a pandemic. At least Tony Soprano always paid the hospital bills of his mob rivals after he busted their kneecaps or otherwise beat them to a bloody pulp.
As it is, in "real" life, the White House mob reportedly has been discussing how many people they can decently allow to die of Covid before they can finally stop pretending to care.
So fuggedabout reality. It's on with the show because the show must go on.
It was French philosopher Guy Debord who wrote that "the spectacle is essentially tautological, for the simple reason that its means and its ends are identical. It is the sun that never sets on the empire of modern passivity. It covers the entire globe, basking in the perpetual warmth of its own glory."
We the spectators can channel-surf so obsessively that more often than not, we simply give up and don't watch anything at all. It is the opposite situation in our political system, however, which has only two channels to present to us the hopes and dreams and narratives which they've so carefully manufactured for us..
This Manichean state of affairs is exactly how the populace is controlled by the owners and purveyors of information. They have attempted to commodify our very attention. So if we do tune in to Thursday night's corporate political extravaganza, we paradoxically will be united by the spectacle at the same time that we are isolated from one another. The more that we remain glued to the tube, as Debord wrote, the less that we can think, let alone live.
And that is by design. That is the whole point.
No word yet if the enhanced political propaganda posing as a legal hearing will itself be interrupted by ads. But I wouldn't be surprised.
"The spectacle is capital accumulated to the point where it becomes image." - Guy Debord.
"Sometimes it's important to give people the illusion of being in control." -- Tony Soprano.
9 comments:
Will Rachel Maddow be on the show? I can hardly wait to watch it Thursday, (if I'm not watching a playback of the NBA finals).
You know, it does feel like "the walls are closing in"; not on Trump but on the rest of us.
Sen. Sam Ervin was not the most dramatic or compelling moderator of the 1973 Watergate hearings but he did manage to keep a nation engaged in the unfolding spectacle of Nixon's criminality for many months of televised testimony.
In those days the droll Walter Cronkite was the gold standard of believable news dissemination as cable, podcats, showmanship, hyperbole, infotainment and alternative facts were only glimmers in the eyes of corporate controlled media. (GE in 1986 was the first multinational to acquire and control a major news outlet.)
So things have changed significantly since a US President was brought down through the mundane droll of hearings in a Capitol meeting room on the malfeasance of election tampering. The old approach will not work again. Nixon's clandestine conspiracy did not incite a mob to storm the Capitol. It was a secretive, closed circuit plot with few players.
Trump's machinations were a public spectacle acted out and televised in real time to not only capture and hold hostage a legal process, but also to inspire a broad populist outrage over a supposedly stolen election.
The Jan 6 Committee Chair Rep. Bennie Thompson does not even have the media presence of a Sam Ervin. The viewing public does not have the attention span to focus on the details or follow the torturous path of legal documentation and process that covers an ocean of electronic and printed evidence.
In today's world a media spectacle must have all the razzle and dazzle, showmanship and hype to compete effectively. Public opinion is the key component to successfully countering the over-the-top performances of the rightists.
I'm not personally a Disney fan. But they do know how to put on a show and right now that is what is needed. Trump is a master of media manipulation. It worked for him and continues to work. If this is the age of spectacle then the one who puts on the best spectacle will prevail. It will not work to stay pure of principle and above the fray by engaging in a street fight with parlor manners -- and this is a street fight.
They are just flogging a horse long past dead.
True, something useful could have been done, needs to be done. They are not doing any of that.
This is just what they do instead of dealing with any of our many real problems. Hype and smoke.
Maybe Mild Merrick Garland will watch and discover that there may be something for the Justice Department to investigate, even if over a year too late.
Is anyone running an office pool as to how many Congressional seats the Democrats will lose in November?
I watch the movie NETWORK last evening. It premiered in 1976 so 46 years ago. Head-exploding and mind-boggling how prescient it was!
I think a lot of the politically designed theatrics are coming across as thinner and thinner on an American public that is feeling more and more squeezed out of any opportunity for a decent life for themselves and their children. The proxy war has backfired on the Democrats who thought people would rally around a war president but will result in more inflation and shortages. They can blame Putin all they like but sooner or later even the party faithful will wonder why the Democrats didn't even try to make peace between Russia and the Ukraine at the beginning. The "bipartisan" sell out gun bill that came straight out of the NRA playbook just made the Democrats look as weak and impotent as they really are. And now, the January 6 hearings where aside from a few sensational clips have essentially found nothing that most of us didn't know or at least suspected. I had no idea there were consultants brought in to stage/orchestrate what the public sees of the hearings. It looks like the Democrats are back to their only election ploy - vote for us, the other guys are worse. Is there anything these straw Democrats touch that doesn't turn into a soggy mess? It is so obvious the downward spiral is spinning faster and faster.
Is Chris Hedges a Sardonicky fan by chance? This looks like a cut and paste piece:
https://consortiumnews.com/2022/06/13/chris-hedges-society-of-spectacle/
Three salient and sickening points to the article below:
(1) The headline egregiously distorts what “the leftwing congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez” actually said.
(2) The screed proceeds, by the “leftwing” and “vocal member” label, to cast her position as marginal and divisive.
(3) "Many of the Democratic Party’s biggest donors ... have quietly started to poke around for alternatives in 2024." That reveals the fraud: the Democratic Party is owned by the money, not the people, and therefore NOT democratic.
AOC refuses to endorse Biden for 2024 as Democrats doubt his ability to win —
Congresswoman says she’s focused on trying to preserve Democrats’ congressional majority in November’s midterms.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/12/aoc-biden-2024-election-democrats-anxiety
12 June 2022 ~ by Richard Luscombe
Dear Karen and everyone,
THIS MAGIC MOMENT httaxxdogs.org
I read an interesting piece in the Directors’ Guild of America, on the last episode of The Sopranos, of which I am a big fan.
There was a lot of speculation around just how this Soprano family fares in the end.
The children are completely innocent of the crimes committed by Tony Soprano, and his wife, Carmella, certainly had the choice of divorcing him so she is partially guilty by association.
Are they all killed in the restaurant by the suspicious man man, or is Tony killed, or are some of them killed, or do they all go home unscathed by the whole thing which is a false alarm?
However, Mr Chase, the writer himself, does not know how the story ends. The
Interesting part of it is just that; Mr Chase’s take on it.
Post a Comment